oldmanriver
Member
Re: Searching the Code
Yes,
The reason I said "I suspect, though we will see it miss this round in NEC", is because I've reviewed the pending docs, posted on-line, when trying to find out initially if NEC was mandating this code change, and I found nothing there to suggest it will come up in the May session.
I realize it still could be introduced "ad-hoc" but don't expect that, unless you know something I don't.
The reason I said "For now you will probably get past inspectors, but not attorneys, if there is a law suit." is because regardless of current NEC a sharp attorney suing for damages will hammer you with all the standards, not just NEC. Have you ever been party to a suit, where you and the GC had you validate you've done everything right?
I thankfully haven't had the pleasure either, but have had it happen to friends, that's close enough.
Oh! by the way here is what I got from BICSI:
****************
The Commercial Building Standard for Telecommunications Pathways and Spaces, in Clause 7.2.4.1 states,
"7.2.4 Provisioning
7.2.4.1 A minimum of two walls should be covered with rigidly fixed 20 mm (3/4 in) A-C
plywood, preferably void free, 2440 mm (8 ft) high, capable of supporting attached
equipment. Plywood should be either fire-rated or covered with two coats of fire
retardant paint"
Regards,
Richard E. Dunfee RCDD/OSP Specialist
BICSI Training Program Manager
****************
I have not gotten anything on section 7.9 yet and am waiting on that. I need section 7.9 for a spec I am writing, but this is where I got the eye opener about two walls.
Yes,
The reason I said "I suspect, though we will see it miss this round in NEC", is because I've reviewed the pending docs, posted on-line, when trying to find out initially if NEC was mandating this code change, and I found nothing there to suggest it will come up in the May session.
I realize it still could be introduced "ad-hoc" but don't expect that, unless you know something I don't.
The reason I said "For now you will probably get past inspectors, but not attorneys, if there is a law suit." is because regardless of current NEC a sharp attorney suing for damages will hammer you with all the standards, not just NEC. Have you ever been party to a suit, where you and the GC had you validate you've done everything right?
I thankfully haven't had the pleasure either, but have had it happen to friends, that's close enough.
Oh! by the way here is what I got from BICSI:
****************
The Commercial Building Standard for Telecommunications Pathways and Spaces, in Clause 7.2.4.1 states,
"7.2.4 Provisioning
7.2.4.1 A minimum of two walls should be covered with rigidly fixed 20 mm (3/4 in) A-C
plywood, preferably void free, 2440 mm (8 ft) high, capable of supporting attached
equipment. Plywood should be either fire-rated or covered with two coats of fire
retardant paint"
Regards,
Richard E. Dunfee RCDD/OSP Specialist
BICSI Training Program Manager
****************
I have not gotten anything on section 7.9 yet and am waiting on that. I need section 7.9 for a spec I am writing, but this is where I got the eye opener about two walls.