mdshunk
Senior Member
- Location
- Right here.
Re: SER connector
[ November 27, 2005, 05:33 PM: Message edited by: mdshunk ]
[ November 27, 2005, 05:33 PM: Message edited by: mdshunk ]
They're not service conductors.Originally posted by pierre:
Of course you do have these other choices.
230.43
NM's not on the list, but MC is. They certainly make MC in the gauges we'd need for a service. All kidding aside, I'm not giving it some thought for these oddball installations, since they have a 90* connector available. I'm now pondering what special bonding efforts I'd need to attend to in that case.Originally posted by georgestolz:
They're not service conductors.Originally posted by pierre:
Of course you do have these other choices.
230.43
Do they make 1/3 CU NM?
Hmmmm... that might throw a hitch into my grand plan. It does sort of have a removable cover. Why would you ever need to remove it, though? You can't replace the conductors in MC cable like you could do with an LB and a raceway system. There's no viable reason why that fitting would ever require service. If we we're talking Greenfield, and not MC, I'd say that it can't be buried. If that cable ever needed replaced, you'd have to open up the wall anyhow. I say it can be buried for now...Originally posted by jbwhite:
can a 90 deg MC connector be legally burried in a wall?
They're not service conductors, mdshunk.Originally posted by mdshunk:
NM's not on the list (230.43), but MC is.
Most people call me Marc.Originally posted by georgestolz:
They're not service conductors, mdshunk.Originally posted by mdshunk:
NM's not on the list (230.43), but MC is.
No, I'm saying Pierre's list doesn't apply, there's a main breaker outside. Or are we talking in circles?Oh, right. They're cables and raceway systems. Jeeze...
I imagine the 1/2" or so of OSB + Siding might throw a wrench in the works. Try it out, let me know how it goes.Originally posted by mdshunk:
That would fit nicely in a 2x4 wall.
I need to tell that side of my brain to stop giggling, grown-up stuff is going on.Selecting how one enters the enclosure is very important.
Would this be the bending space at terminals?Originally posted by pierre:
3/0 requires minimum of 4 inches of bending radius inside the panel as per 312.6. Selecting how one enters the enclosure is very important.
I agree. Are you trying to indicate that an MC cable fitting exists for a certain size of MC cable that can't be used in a compliant manner? I don't think you are.Originally posted by pierre:
3/0 requires minimum of 4 inches of bending radius inside the panel as per 312.6. Selecting how one enters the enclosure is very important.