Because if they're connected on both ends they are in parallel and the EGC, which under normal conditions shouldn't carry current, will.
Welcome to the forum.![]()
can someone tell me exactly why i need to seperate grounded and grounding conductors after the main disconnect?
thanks for the help. ive worked in the field doing mostly res for about 6 yrs now. i know how things are to be done but sometimes i forget the why. lately ive been digging into grounding vs bonding just because i had questions on the two. it seems i dont fully understand some items and i hope this forum will help.
thanks for the help. ive worked in the field doing mostly res for about 6 yrs now. i know how things are to be done but sometimes i forget the why. lately ive been digging into grounding vs bonding just because i had questions on the two. it seems i dont fully understand some items and i hope this forum will help.
you have come to the right place you will learn a lot .I have in just a few weeks.
Derck How did you post that graf???
Derck How did you post that graf???
He draws them on the screen with a crayon![]()
480Sparky wrote a post on how to do it. It is in the FAQ thread.
Here is the post:
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showpost.php?p=760873&postcount=45
thanks for that illustration it helps to clear things up. the only issue i still have (trying not to be too much of a dub here) is what difference does it make that this occurs on the load side of the main disconnect? the grounded and egc are still tied together at the service.i get the parallel current issue......................i think
thanks for that illustration it helps to clear things up. the only issue i still have (trying not to be too much of a dub here) is what difference does it make that this occurs on the load side of the main disconnect? the grounded and egc are still tied together at the service.i get the parallel current issue......................i think
Electricity follows path of LEAST resistance.
Have one low resistance grounding point with shortest possible distance to earth (greater length=more resitance). Fault currents get routed safely to ground rod or electrode, away from human contact. Ground loops (which parallel path would create) double the distance current must travel.
Electricity follows path of LEAST resistance.
Have one low resistance grounding point with shortest possible distance to earth (greater length=more resitance). Fault currents get routed safely to ground rod or electrode, away from human contact. Ground loops (which parallel path would create) double the distance current must travel.
High-amp faults travelling on surface of metal enclosures or conduits can and will jump to shorter (less resistive) path to ground, I.E.: person touching metal, standing on concrete basement floor in bare feet...
To prevent this, make ground path resistance low as possible, seperate grounds from neutrals at all points (EXCEPT where service entrance conductors connect to service equipment).
We bond neutral to grounding electrode conductor once (at service entrance), to give fault current in neutral a safe way out of system, to earth.
It also helps to mention that the shocking current is in addition to the circuit's existing current."The reason that a person gets shocked when touching an ungrounded conductor and the earth is because the neutral of the system is repeatedly connected to earth in a grounded electrical system. The earth becomes part of a return path to the transformer ? it?s part of one route back to the source; the earth is not the destination for the electricity."
Yes, objectionable current yet the NEC allows emt or metal conduit between the meter and the first panel along with a neutral conductor. Is that not parallel and objectionable when it is all bonded together? I never understood that.