Thanks. It is a wire way.Is the enclosure in question an Article 366 Auxiliary Gutter, or an Article 376, Wireway? The answer is yes if it is an auxiliary gutter, but no if it is a wireway. Auxiliary gutters are pretty rare. Most everything an electrician calls a gutter is really a wireway.
Ok. Read everything. But still don’t see code or definition where the unprotected service conductors from utility meter can not be combined with protected conductors from main disconnect in same wire wayIs the enclosure in question an Article 366 Auxiliary Gutter, or an Article 376, Wireway? The answer is yes if it is an auxiliary gutter, but no if it is a wireway. Auxiliary gutters are pretty rare. Most everything an electrician calls a gutter is really a wireway.
I think what Don was saying is that a wireway is a raceway and therefore 230.7 applies. An auxiliary gutter is not a raceway so it would be allowed. I'm sure Don will correct me if I'm wrong.Ok. Read everything. But still don’t see code or definition where the unprotected service conductors from utility meter can not be combined with protected conductors from main disconnect in same wire way
What Dennis said, plus 376.2 Definition makes it clear a wireway is a raceway.Ok. Read everything. But still don’t see code or definition where the unprotected service conductors from utility meter can not be combined with protected conductors from main disconnect in same wire way
In general if the enclosure is connected to another enclosure using nipples, it is is a wireway and not an auxiliary gutter.For me a picture was worth a thousand words
Auxiliary Gutter-- sort of like an extension ring
View attachment 2561847
Good to know. I assumed this one had an open bottom.In general if the enclosure is connected to another enclosure using nipples, it is is a wireway and not an auxiliary gutter.
If you determine that it would be code compliant, also check the design criteria for the utility. Austin Energy and CPS (San Antonio) expressly prohibit it.Ok. Read everything. But still don’t see code or definition where the unprotected service conductors from utility meter can not be combined with protected conductors from main disconnect in same wire way
I think that is generally called a "bussed gutter"How about a horizontal gutter with buss bars that feed metered main panels, what is that called ?
I think that is generally called a "bussed gutter"
I have heard it called a "bus duct".I think that is generally called a "bussed gutter"
With POCO's it isn't so much protected vs unprotected as much as they simply don't want metered and unmetered mixed in anything except for the meter socket to help prevent theft of service.If you determine that it would be code compliant, also check the design criteria for the utility. Austin Energy and CPS (San Antonio) expressly prohibit it.