Service Entrance and (2) 200 AMP disconnect setup

[Dennis Alwon]

No, because in that case it is not a service disconnect. By the way, I should have joined this forum years ago. It is so much better than Reddit.

Exactly, so I am not sure where our misunderstanding is happening

 

[Epalmateer]

Exactly, so I am not sure where our misunderstanding is happening

I don't think there is one, I think I just got lost in the conversation. I think we are both saying the same thing. Sorry

 

[electrofelon]

Well, the neutral an egc can only be bonded in one location right? Before the service there is no egc.

Right, my point was that neutral is bonded to non current carrying metal on the supply side the service disconnect - possibly in multiple places. These are called supply side bonding jumpers on the supply side.

 

[Epalmateer]

Correct. I had a heated debate with a guy on Reddit, who is adamant that no matter what you label the emergency disconnect you still need egc to panel in house. He was getting all fired up, and I invited him to come debate it on the forum. Hopefully that is okay.

Right, my point was that neutral is bonded to non current carrying metal on the supply side the service disconnect - possibly in multiple places. These are called supply side bonding jumpers on the supply side.

 

[Dennis Alwon]

and I invited him to come debate it on the forum. Hopefully that is okay.

Of course it is okay as long as they are in the trade or associated with it as in an engineer, etc

 

[Epalmateer]

Of course it is okay as long as they are in the trade or associated with it as in an engineer, etc

I'm going to start a new thread in general topic calles "230.85(3)" debate and send him the link

 

[Epalmateer]

I'm going to start a new thread in general topic calles "230.85(3)" debate and send him the link

Of course it is okay as long as they are in the trade or associated with it as in an engineer, etc

"230.85(3) Debate"*******

 

[Dennis Alwon]

Send him this link

 

[Epalmateer]

Send him this link

Ok