NEC Section 695.3 (A)(1) permits a separate service from a connection located ahead of but not within the service disconnecting means,as a power source for a fire pump. Would this service be considered a legally required system?
The reason for my asking is NEC Section 701.11(D) An additional service installed in accordance with Article 230,where acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, is permitted to serve as a legally required source of power.
To minimize the possibility of simultaneous interruption of the legally required standby supply, a separate service drop or lateral must be electrically and physically separated from all other service conductors.
The key word may be (standby) The service to the Fire Pump is not a standby system but the primary feed.
I am going to be inspecting a fire pump installation, The service is underground in pvc. The pvc for the normal and fire pump services are very close and already buried. Both services will be going up the same pole and connected to the same service drop. If 701.11 (D) applies I don't think it is code compliant.
Comments appreciated.
The reason for my asking is NEC Section 701.11(D) An additional service installed in accordance with Article 230,where acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, is permitted to serve as a legally required source of power.
To minimize the possibility of simultaneous interruption of the legally required standby supply, a separate service drop or lateral must be electrically and physically separated from all other service conductors.
The key word may be (standby) The service to the Fire Pump is not a standby system but the primary feed.
I am going to be inspecting a fire pump installation, The service is underground in pvc. The pvc for the normal and fire pump services are very close and already buried. Both services will be going up the same pole and connected to the same service drop. If 701.11 (D) applies I don't think it is code compliant.
Comments appreciated.