Service upgrade

[electro7]

Doing a residential service upgrade in CA under the CEC. See photos attached. Inspector said according to CEC 230.7 the service entrance conductors we have going from the load side of the meter base into the panel main breaker need to have a barrier around the CO doctors inside the panel. I told him that the panel isn't a raceway. Can someone help me to know if I am correct and that I can run the service entrance conductors inside the main panel and land them on the main breaker without a barrier? Or can I not do that, if so what's the code section.

Thanks ahead of time.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[electro7]

He said the panel is a raceway according to the definition of a raceway in the code.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[electro7]

Sorry, picture attached here

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[AC\DC]

that's the dumbest thing. so every panel would require that barrier how else would you get them to a main breaker.
Definition of race way in 2023 i
s" An enclosed channel designed EXPRESSLY for holding wires, cables, or busbars with additional function as permitted in this code:

only thing I see him trying to tie it in is Busbars. but look at definition of busbars I don't feel this application applies to that, as far as the equipment that is mentioned under busbars.

busbars as I think this is referencing is ones you would mount in a gutter.

 

[infinity]

A panelboard is installed in a cabinet. A cabinet is not a raceway.

 

[electro7]

That's what I said. I think he is so used to seeing meter main combo panels that doing something different from that threw him off. He is asking for an engineers letter because what I did was "unsafe".

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[infinity]

That's what I said. I think he is so used to seeing meter main combo panels that doing something different from that threw him off. He is asking for an engineers letter because what I did was "unsafe".

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

If it's unsafe maybe he can come up with an appropriate code section that was violated. I wouldn't hold my breath, someone who doesn't know the difference between a cabinet and a raceway probably won't change his mind.

 

[jim dungar]

Doing a residential service upgrade in CA under the CEC. See photos attached. Inspector said according to CEC 230.7 the service entrance conductors we have going from the load side of the meter base into the panel main breaker need to have a barrier around the CO doctors inside the panel.

Is your inspector from Canada?

 

[Ponchik]

IMO, the AHJ wants the unprotected service conductors in a channel of some kind (approved method) not a cardboard.

To OP, is there a reason you didn't install a meter main?

 

[electro7]

Is your inspector from Canada?

No California

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[electro7]

IMO, the AHJ wants the unprotected service conductors in a channel of some kind (approved method) not a cardboard.

To OP, is there a reason you didn't install a meter main?

Yeah the service conductors were coming up on the righthand side and I was unable to find a meter main combo, readily accessible, with underground feed right hand side and surface mount.

Is there a code that says I can't run the service entrance conductors through a nipple and inside the main panel to the main breaker?

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[rc/retired]

Is there a code that says I can't run the service entrance conductors through a nipple and inside the main panel to the main breaker?

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Nothing in the NEC prohibits your installation. I've done it many times and approved the installation many times.
Definitely not "unsafe" by any stretch.

Ron

 

[electro7]

Nothing in the NEC prohibits your installation. I've done it many times and approved the installation many times.
Definitely not "unsafe" by any stretch.

Ron

Thanks, Ron.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[qcroanoke]

Is your inspector from Canada?

Exactly what I was going to ask!

 

[Ponchik]

Yeah the service conductors were coming u.........

Is there a code that says I can't run the service entrance conductors through a nipple and inside the main panel to the main breaker?

You are good to go

From the NEC Handbook


All feeder and branch-circuit conductors must be separated from service conductors. Service conductors are not pro- vided with overcurrent protection where they receive their supply; they are protected against overload conditions at their load end by the service disconnect fuses or circuit breakers. The amount of current that could be imposed on feeder or branch-circuit conductors, should they be in the same raceway and a fault occur, would be much higher than the ampacity of the feeder or branch-circuit conductors. The gutter space of a panelboard cabinet or other electrical equipment enclosure is not a raceway (see definition of raceway in Article 100), therefore is not subject to the re- quirement of 230.7 Service conductors, feeder conductors, and branch circuit conductors can share the same gutter space, as shown in Exhibit 230.16. Conductor bending space requirements for cabinets are covered in 312.6 and 408.55, and conductor fill requirements for cabinet gutter spaces are covered in 312.8

 

[marmathsen]

Is your inspector from Canada?

Exactly what I was going to ask!

What am I missing here ...?

Rob G, Seattle

 

[letgomywago]

What am I missing here ...?

Rob G, Seattle

Canada has a metal barrier on their main service conductors that no other wires can go into. That's why they do the sideways panel changeouts there.

 

[shortcircuit2]

Looks good to me. Just bond that offset (raceway) nipple per 250.92

 

[electro7]

You are good to go

From the NEC Handbook


All feeder and branch-circuit conductors must be separated from service conductors. Service conductors are not pro- vided with overcurrent protection where they receive their supply; they are protected against overload conditions at their load end by the service disconnect fuses or circuit breakers. The amount of current that could be imposed on feeder or branch-circuit conductors, should they be in the same raceway and a fault occur, would be much higher than the ampacity of the feeder or branch-circuit conductors. The gutter space of a panelboard cabinet or other electrical equipment enclosure is not a raceway (see definition of raceway in Article 100), therefore is not subject to the re- quirement of 230.7 Service conductors, feeder conductors, and branch circuit conductors can share the same gutter space, as shown in Exhibit 230.16. Conductor bending space requirements for cabinets are covered in 312.6 and 408.55, and conductor fill requirements for cabinet gutter spaces are covered in 312.8

Thanks!

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

 

[augie47]

What am I missing here ...?

Rob G, Seattle

canadian service panel