..like AFCI where the only folks making money on them is the manufacturer and the EC is left holding the bag for all the trip calls, well then, that's a problem.
Blame it on the standard.
Fire & safety devices are governed by OSHA's selection of NRTL test standards, and CPSC's investigation of standard compliance, however de-funded or industry-appointee hamstrung between political administrations.
While commercial & industrial solid-state over-current devices endure extreme utility excursions (perhaps EM shielding borrowed from inverters per UL 1741 SA), nothing in UL 1699, 489, or 67 test requirements define or limit nuisance trips, premature failure, or utility-grid exposure.
UL 1741 SA is a safety standard that lays out the manufacturing (including software) and product testing requirements with the goal of producing inverters more capable of riding through grid excursions, and won't apply to devices that only rectify utility sources for DC logic, such as AFCI's, GFCI's, or Siemens UL listed file E82615.
No recalls should be expected without listing violations, or catastrophic failures resulting in casualty. Keeping any residential solid-state device working may indefinitely require technical skills in the field with OEM tech support.
Unskilled laborer shops and their slave masters may need to lobby their AHJ's to amended out more labor-intensive devices, an order of magnitude more expensive, to force manufactures to keep making the legacy thermal-magnetic device.
