weressl
Esteemed Member
don_resqcapt19 said:The roping is specified in the manufacturer's instructions and it is UL's position (one that I don't agree with and have taken issue with many times) that any instructions provided by the manufacturer are 110.3(B) instructions and must be followed. As I recall the provided instructions specify the type of rope to be used. In this case the instructions specified sisal.
Sounds like UL's position is over-reaching.
My point though was that I questioned that UL tested the SC withstand performance of the roping arrangement, therefore it was not part of their approval testing.
If UL have not tested the roping arrangement and should it result in a legal case, in your opinion, what percentages of liability would be assigned to the parties? UL/NEC/Square D?