The inspector has a BAD idea.
The inspector has a BAD idea.
new construction, 2 story, 3 unit building,(1st floor storefront and 2 small apts on 2nd floor)...... 3 separate meters, no common areas, no common entrances.....MY PROBLEM.....building inspector wants 110v bbu interconnected smoke detectors among the 3 units..... MY QUESTION....how would the apt tenants shut off a false alarm from the unoccupied storefront in the middle of the night or the storefront tenants shut off a false alarm from the unoccupied apts in the middle of the day.
They don't. They will disconnect the smokes causing a hazard. What the inspector wants will lead to the smokes being eventually disconnected. Politely point this out to the instpector, and sell him on an actual FACP if he wants fire protection. Of course this will still have some problems, but that's normal in mixed use.
He wont have a code to reference, unless is local. I get this situation a lot, when an EC is upgrading the services, they want fire protection, but it just doesn't work the way he is asking for it. Chat him up and discuss the benefits of a complete Fire alarm, even if its just a local alarm, along with the 110 Volt smokes as well (or the wireless interconnects if this is a retrofit and they will allow it.)
I've had a couple of buildings like this, we call a building like that "tax payers" here. The resi units got their own smokes independent of the other units. The FACP has fixed temp heats (
almost eliminating any false alarms) and smokes in the commercial space. Pulls at all of the level exits of discharge per floor, but not in the resi units (small children=false alarms) Normally there would be minihorns in the bedrooms, maybe a horn/strobe by the main entries, in the resi.
This is the best solution that balances safety and false alarm head aches, IMO.
You also get to install a fire system and make $.