- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC
- Occupation
- Retired Electrical Contractor
I was browsing the 2010 ROP Draft and stumbled across a couple of interesting proposals.
Table 310.16 has a change- I can't remember the last time that happened but I am not surprised at the changed.
Right now the draft shows #14 @ 60C will no longer be 20 amps but back down to 15
The same is true for #12 @ 60C. It will now be 20 amps instead of 25 amps.
Also art. 310.15(B)(6) will now be art. 310.15(B)(7).
Table 310.16 is now Table 310.15(B)(16).
Now I am confused in part "B". Sounds like feeders will have to use 310.15(B)(16) whether they carry the full load or not. I wonder if they meant Table 310.15(B)(7).
Anyone make sense of that.
Table 310.16 has a change- I can't remember the last time that happened but I am not surprised at the changed.
Right now the draft shows #14 @ 60C will no longer be 20 amps but back down to 15
The same is true for #12 @ 60C. It will now be 20 amps instead of 25 amps.
Also art. 310.15(B)(6) will now be art. 310.15(B)(7).
310.15(B)(7) 120/240-Volt, Single-Phase Dwelling Services and
Feeders [ROP 6-53].
(a) For individual dwelling units of one-family, twofamily, and multifamily dwellings, conductors, as listed in Table 310.15(B)(7), shall be permitted as 120/240-volt, single-phase service-entrance conductors and service lateral conductors. [ROP 6-53]
(b) Feeder conductors for a dwelling unit, after adjustments and corrections, shall not be required to have an ampacity rating greater than the Table 310.15(B)(16) allowable ampacity of the service conductors. [ROP 6-83a, 6-85]
(c) The grounded conductor shall be permitted to be smaller than the ungrounded conductors, provided the requirements of 215.2, 220.61, and 230.42 are met.
Table 310.16 is now Table 310.15(B)(16).
Now I am confused in part "B". Sounds like feeders will have to use 310.15(B)(16) whether they carry the full load or not. I wonder if they meant Table 310.15(B)(7).
Anyone make sense of that.