Splice and Tap UG Service

Status
Not open for further replies.

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
none..if its a service rated TS. But would not anything downsteam from a service rated TS need the neutral-ground seperated ?
I may be missing your point, but it seems if the TS is not at the house, whether it be a service rated T/S (requiring internal OCP) or one with seperate OCP ahead of it, the 4th wire would be needed to the house.
This is the question I posed in Post #10:
Is it possible to place a service-rated ATS ahead of a service disconnect?
Is there such a thing as a service-rated TS without line-side OCPD? Even a service-rated TS with line-side switch (i.e. no OCP) would suffice.

If not, then it would be impossible to have a TS ahead of the service disconnecting means. Separate grounded and grounding conductors are required after the service disconnecting means.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
A tap for the barn service before a transfer switch for the house isn't a problem is it?

I could put the OCP right next to the transfer switch but I take it the seperate EGC would still be required going to the house?
Just a thought... :rolleyes:

You could get around running the EGC issue if you were to install a 240:120/240 transformer at the house. This is assuming you have the meter, service disconnecting means and TS at the barn. You then would only need two ungrounded conductors at 240V and an EGC (the existing neutral).
 

mkgrady

Senior Member
Location
Massachusetts
Just a thought... :rolleyes:

You could get around running the EGC issue if you were to install a 240:120/240 transformer at the house. This is assuming you have the meter, service disconnecting means and TS at the barn. You then would only need two ungrounded conductors at 240V and an EGC (the existing neutral).

There isn't a good place to install a transformer at the house.

Thanks to everybody that responded. Still not sure what I am going to recommend to the customer but I feel better prepared to make up my mind going forward.
 

hurk27

Senior Member
Not sure what version of the NEC your under, but if your still under the 2002 you could have used 250.32(B)(2) which use to allow a 3-wire installation to the other building under the listed requirements. but I think this was changed in the 2005
 

LawnGuyLandSparky

Senior Member
According to the customer he owns the lateral, but the meter is at the house, not on the riser pole, so I'm not sure who really owns it.

The customer probably paid for the lateral because it was beyond what the POCO provides, which is probably about 100' ariel connection. This doesn't mean the customer "owns" the underground cable anymore than the customer owns the meter that some POCO's charge a meter set fee on.

The only thing the customer is certain of is that he doesn't want the house to feed the barn because that trench would really disturb his landscaping and brick walks.

-He doesn't want a new lateral run from the barn to the pole or manhole.
-He doesn't want the house to feed the barn.
-He doesn't want the landscaping disturbed.
-He wants a 100a service in the barn fed from the existing lateral and that may not be possible, or permissable.

Your customer has a problem with "no." To build a barn to include a compressor, welder, and not expect to do a little digging is IMHO ridiculious wishful thinking. You're a contractor not a fairy godmother. An electrician, not a magician.

Once you know for sure what the POCO will and will not allow, tell the customer what his options are, and don't entertain the impossible. I have a feeling the POCO is not going to allow any sort of handhole access on the buried 4/0 and will require buried splices, backfilled under their watch. He's going to end up trenching one way ot the other... or settle for a O/H service from the pole to the barn, or from the house to the barn.
 

Fulthrotl

~Autocorrect is My Worst Enema.~
Customer has an underground service feeding his house. The service lateral is about 200 feet long. He is going to build a barn and the UG service runs under the corner of where he will build it, so the service lateral must be moved. I'd say the corner of the building would cover about 8 feet of the existing cable. The new barn location is about the mid point of the run. The service lateral is direct buried 4/0 aluminum cable. Owner says it's 18 inches deep. I think it should have been 24" to meet code but I hope that is not an issue.

I'm thinking of installing two handholes a few feet back from where the foundation will be excavated, and running new cable around the corner of the building. I'll keep the cable several feet away from the new structure and bury it at least 2 feet deep. Splices will be made in each handhole to complete the circuit. I'll ask the Poco to shut it down during the excavation, trenching, cable laying, splicing and inspection which will take all day.

He also wants power in the new barn. Just a few lights, receptacles, maybe a welder, maybe a compressor. I'm thinking a 100 amp service to the barn but most of the time it will draw nothing at all. Would you expect the Poco would want a new UG lateral back to the pole? Or would you expect them to allow a tap into the handhole for a service. Customer doesn't want to dig back to the riser pole because he will likely dig into his existing service.

I'll discuss both issues with the Poco (Nstar) but thought I'd run it by you guys and gals first. Any feedback?

And last but not least, he wants to put a generator outside the barn to feed the house during outages. He figures he can utilize the existing cables that feed the house that run right by the barn. I told him those cables would not make his generator installation any easier and to trench a seperate run for that. I think he is just going to skip the generator as part of this project. I guess if money were no object to him (I don't know) I could put a 200 amp transfer switch in the barn and size the generator for the full house load but it seems pretty complicated and I'm not sure what the Poco would say about it.

Sorry for such a long post. Thanks for any input. Mike

first and foremost, do a proper survey of the customers fundage. this is gonna
cost. :smile:

see what the poco will allow to be put on those 4/0 feeders, as a service upgrade. upstream of the barn is the issue, obviously.

you can get a 400 amp residential service, that has a 200 amp panel in it,
and a 200 amp branch circuit to feed another panel, for something like $800.

make the house panel a sub off of the 400 amp service.

as for the direct burial feeders, skip the hand holes. hypress butt splices, and
3M cold shriink tubing. uncovering the hot feeders is best accomplished using
patience, and a *good* circuit tracer... amprobe's 326b is excellent.... with
a bit of practice, you can located underground feeders within two inches on
location, and two inches on depth.

for the transfer switch, and genset, you can put those downstream of that
200 amp breaker. keeps it simple. a whole house genset is gonna be 'spensive,
and you'll have to consider where to put the propane tank to run it, where it
can be filled, and such... a 500 gallon tank can be purchased for 1,200~1,500

anyway, that's my opinionated opinion, for what it's worth.... :smile:
 
You "could" capture the the existing service at the barn and install a Nordic Secondary Pedestal. They have a flat lid on them and will not be nocible when installed. Inside the pedestal you can use a sweetheart connector and splice the existing service and tap a feeder to the barn. Providing that the Power Company will allow this installation it will make a cleaner easier installation.

Just my 2 cents....
 

mkgrady

Senior Member
Location
Massachusetts
You "could" capture the the existing service at the barn and install a Nordic Secondary Pedestal. They have a flat lid on them and will not be nocible when installed. Inside the pedestal you can use a sweetheart connector and splice the existing service and tap a feeder to the barn. Providing that the Power Company will allow this installation it will make a cleaner easier installation.

Just my 2 cents....

Not sure why this is better than a splice in the ground, with or without a handhole. Also, what is a sweetheart connector?
 
A sweetheart connector is like a buss-bar or z-bar in a transformer. A long bar with allen head bolts to connect cables. It also has a covering with plugs for the bolts.

Not really a better idea, just an alternative. It keeps from burying a splice and gives you more working room than a handhole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top