Just had to throw that one on the fireJust curious, does the DB cable have an overiszed EGC?
Just curious, does the DB cable have an overiszed EGC?
Could be, take a look at 250.122(B).Now that you jogged my memory It needs to be? It also needs to be when you parallel conductors?
Could be, take a look at 250.122(B).
ptonsparky made a good point. It all depends on where the first 100A breaker is, i.e. you can put 4/0AL on a 200A breaker and run it ten feet on up to ten miles or more and not have to use a larger EGC. Put the same wire under a 100A breaker or less and you need to upsize the EGC.There seems to be a other opinions though?
ptonsparky made a good point. It all depends on where the first 100A breaker is, i.e. you can put 4/0AL on a 200A breaker and run it ten feet on up to ten miles or more and not have to use a larger EGC. Put the same wire under a 100A breaker or less and you need to upsize the EGC.
Make sense? Of course not.
What's important is- Why did you upsize to 4/0? What is the connected load? If you need 100A at a great distance from the source then voltage drop is a real concern and the EGC should be upsized.
It is only with 15, 20 & 30 amp circuits that 250.122(B) causes real heartache.
Once you get above those sizes things make much more sense.
It gets better but doesn't go away. Take a 40 amp circuit and increase conductors and you are supposed to increase EGC by same proportion, yet if same ungrounded conductors were part of a 60 amp circuit the EGC could easily be smaller than what may required by the 40 amp circuit.
Did I say it went away?
Do you think I am unaware of the rules?
It just seems every time you quote me it is to correct me over things I did not say
Did it ever occur to you that maybe I was just adding my own $.02 and was talking to the entire forum and not just you?