Spot the violation

[Buck Parrish]

Service conductors must be 3 ft above a window that opens.

, Thank You, I knew it was border line.


I wouldn't walk on them steps either, not at all.
The drip loop does not appear to be 10 ft. from the steps.
If the steps we're to code you may have a clearence issue with your panels.

 

[e57]

2" PVC, if thats what it is, requires support every 5 ft.
Service conductors must be 3 ft above a window that opens.

While my POCO wont allow it, the code will.

Exception: Conductors run above the top level of a window shall be permitted to be less than the 900-mm (3-ft) requirement.

 

[Buck Parrish]

It looks like the top of the window is open a bit.

 

[LarryFine]

Service conductors must be 3 ft above a window that opens.

No, they must be either three feet away or above the window.

 

[RUWired]

What problem would that be? Siding guy is going to be happy!

My point was that if all the cables are going the same hole. the chances of multiple occupancy are slim.

I see a violation of article 230.2 and 230.71 in the picture.There are two service drops that are not parallel and there are more than 6 disconnects.
Rick

 

[infinity]

My point was that if all the cables are going the same hole. the chances of multiple occupancy are slim.

I see a violation of article 230.2 and 230.71 in the picture.There are two service drops that are not parallel and there are more than 6 disconnects.
Rick

This amounts to two services so 230.71 won't apply. If the AHJ approves it I see no violation other than the strapping issue. 230.2(C)Ex.

 

[dcspector]

Service conductors must be 3 ft above a window that opens.

05' NEC 230.9(A) see exception.

 

[480sparky]

05' NEC 230.9(A) see exception.

The lower set sure isn't above the top of the window. The POA is about even with the top, and there's a drip loop. Not to mention the sag.

 

[RUWired]

This amounts to two services so 230.71 won't apply. If the AHJ approves it I see no violation other than the strapping issue. 230.2(C)Ex.

You can't see the can, but there is only one transformer feeding it.IMO, if the can is big enough to supply the 2 drops, then only one drop should have been put in, but that would now fall into poco territory.I only see one sticker on the right service equipment.I can't say if both were approved or what the reasoning for the two drops.
Rick

 

[dcspector]

The lower set sure isn't above the top of the window. The POA is about even with the top, and there's a drip loop. Not to mention the sag.

I just made a correction to a post. Not the picture.