Strange duplex receptacle.

Status
Not open for further replies.
white-leviton-outlets-5031-w-64_145.jpg
ivory-leviton-outlets-5842-i-64_145.jpg
I have seen the combination used in high end kitchens in Canada.
 
I can tell you that the receptacle the OP is asking about is not a power/antenna receptacle. Bad things would happen if somebody plugged the antenna plug into the top. 😭

No, the bottom is a polarized 120V receptacle and the only thing that makes sense is a switched receptacle for a lamp. They were done away with the advent of dimmers.

-Hal
 
No, that could allow an antenna plug to receive 120v by mistake.

Some cord caps (plugs) had a prong that you could rotate on the screw to change its orientation.

This is the antenna-and-ground receptacle; the skewed slot is ground:

View attachment 2568962
I never saw one of these but I seem to remember there was a version of this for TV signals back when 300 ohm twin lead was used.
 
Installed a lot of the 120/240 volt duplex ones in an apartment complex when I was an apprentice. One 20 amp 240 volt circuit supplied the electric baseboard heat and the 120/240 volt receptacle for a future wall mount cord and plug connected air conditioner.
 
One was a 3 kW Russel Hobbs kettle and a toaster. Another was some sort of Panini press and food warmer.
In all of my 50 years playing with wire never once used a combination device on new work. Was cheaper to use a two gang box & 2 devices. Turned down small jobs where Johnnie the DYI homeowner remodeled a bathroom and installed a ceiling fan with a luminare & nite light. ( had a skylight & no fan) In a 2 1/2" beveled corner single wall case and wall just had fancy title installed. He thought that I had a big enough shoe horn to install the 3 switch on one yoke device. Box had two sets of 14/2 NM cables in addition to the 14/3 & 14/2 NM he added.
 
Always taught that one breaker can only be used to power a device on a yoke.
You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
 
You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
Liked I replied in a earlier post I was able to plug in a 3 pole 250 volt breaker in a residential single phase panel to not only show but ask the apprentice if he thought it would be legal. Without any three pole breaker being listed on breaker panel sheet the argument would be just because you can use, install or wire something that is not in the NEC does not make it approved for a certain usage. You can use a two pole breaker to supply power to say a duplex 120 volt receptacles where you broke off the tabs and had each halve feed from one pole of a two pole breaker.
 
You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
210.7
 
I learn new things all the time. I wasn't aware of this provision.

210.7 in the 2020 NEC says:
Where two or more branch circuits supply devices or equipment on the same yoke or mounting strap, a means to simultaneously disconnect the ungrounded supply conductors shall be provided at the point where the branch circuits originate.

It wasn't a requirement when I first became an apprentice. In my 1996 code book from when I first started, the similar requirement is section 210-4 (b).

210-4 (b) in the 1996 NEC says:
In dwelling units, a multiwire branch circuit supplying more than one device or equipment on the same yoke shall be provided with a means to disconnect simultaneously all ungrounded conductors at the panelboard where the branch circuit originated.

Perhaps the intent was the same, but the wording of the 1996 version leaves a huge loophole that would allow a duplex receptacle to be split and fed from two completely different circuits, as long as they couldn't be considered a multiwire branch circuit. I never realized we can't do that anymore.
 
I learn new things all the time. I wasn't aware of this provision.

210.7 in the 2020 NEC says:


It wasn't a requirement when I first became an apprentice. In my 1996 code book from when I first started, the similar requirement is section 210-4 (b).

210-4 (b) in the 1996 NEC says:


Perhaps the intent was the same, but the wording of the 1996 version leaves a huge loophole that would allow a duplex receptacle to be split and fed from two completely different circuits, as long as they couldn't be considered a multiwire branch circuit. I never realized we can't do that anymore.
When I started using 1987 NEC it was basically same requirement. Dwellings with muliwire circuit on same yoke. Yes loophole to the wording then would be if not considered a multiwire circuit. Not sure how far before 1987 NEC the rule existed. The later change Don mentioned ended up requiring not only multiwire/multiple circuits on same device to have common disconnect handles but basically all MWBC, regardless where they are or what they supply. Before then was just in dwellings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top