ruxton.stanislaw
Senior Member
- Location
- Arkansas
- Occupation
- Laboratory Engineer
I have seen the combination used in high end kitchens in Canada.
I have seen the combination used in high end kitchens in Canada.
For euro appliances?I have seen the combination used in high end kitchens in Canada.
I never saw one of these but I seem to remember there was a version of this for TV signals back when 300 ohm twin lead was used.No, that could allow an antenna plug to receive 120v by mistake.
Some cord caps (plugs) had a prong that you could rotate on the screw to change its orientation.
This is the antenna-and-ground receptacle; the skewed slot is ground:
View attachment 2568962
Yep, we had one in our house. Then when coax became a thing in the late 60's we had 75 ohm to 300 ohm adaptors so we could match the TV ant. input. How quaint it is by modern standards. 300 ohm twin lead was a real PIA to do correctly. Sadly, I'm showing my age but fun to look back.
One was a 3 kW Russel Hobbs kettle and a toaster. Another was some sort of Panini press and food warmer.For euro appliances?
leviton makes a British 240 style but UL listed for here. Idk if it's cUL listed though
I have an engineer friend who used them in his house's basement to allow 240 volt tools to be pugged in.For safety sake of Johnnie DIY homeowner firmly believe such a device should not be UL approved or allowed in a house.
Correct.Ac over 10 amps at 240 might put it over this
In all of my 50 years playing with wire never once used a combination device on new work. Was cheaper to use a two gang box & 2 devices. Turned down small jobs where Johnnie the DYI homeowner remodeled a bathroom and installed a ceiling fan with a luminare & nite light. ( had a skylight & no fan) In a 2 1/2" beveled corner single wall case and wall just had fancy title installed. He thought that I had a big enough shoe horn to install the 3 switch on one yoke device. Box had two sets of 14/2 NM cables in addition to the 14/3 & 14/2 NM he added.One was a 3 kW Russel Hobbs kettle and a toaster. Another was some sort of Panini press and food warmer.
You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?Always taught that one breaker can only be used to power a device on a yoke.
thats what i think tooThat one, the bottom is 240V for a window AC.
My guess is that the bottom is supposed to be switched for a lamp with a two prong plug.
-Hal
That once was the only reason to use a handle tie.You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
Liked I replied in a earlier post I was able to plug in a 3 pole 250 volt breaker in a residential single phase panel to not only show but ask the apprentice if he thought it would be legal. Without any three pole breaker being listed on breaker panel sheet the argument would be just because you can use, install or wire something that is not in the NEC does not make it approved for a certain usage. You can use a two pole breaker to supply power to say a duplex 120 volt receptacles where you broke off the tabs and had each halve feed from one pole of a two pole breaker.You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
210.7You've taught your apprentices to use only a single breaker to provide all power for any one device. And that may be a good idea, but it's not actually a code requirement, right?
I learn new things all the time. I wasn't aware of this provision.210.7
Where two or more branch circuits supply devices or equipment on the same yoke or mounting strap, a means to simultaneously disconnect the ungrounded supply conductors shall be provided at the point where the branch circuits originate.
In dwelling units, a multiwire branch circuit supplying more than one device or equipment on the same yoke shall be provided with a means to disconnect simultaneously all ungrounded conductors at the panelboard where the branch circuit originated.
When I started using 1987 NEC it was basically same requirement. Dwellings with muliwire circuit on same yoke. Yes loophole to the wording then would be if not considered a multiwire circuit. Not sure how far before 1987 NEC the rule existed. The later change Don mentioned ended up requiring not only multiwire/multiple circuits on same device to have common disconnect handles but basically all MWBC, regardless where they are or what they supply. Before then was just in dwellings.I learn new things all the time. I wasn't aware of this provision.
210.7 in the 2020 NEC says:
It wasn't a requirement when I first became an apprentice. In my 1996 code book from when I first started, the similar requirement is section 210-4 (b).
210-4 (b) in the 1996 NEC says:
Perhaps the intent was the same, but the wording of the 1996 version leaves a huge loophole that would allow a duplex receptacle to be split and fed from two completely different circuits, as long as they couldn't be considered a multiwire branch circuit. I never realized we can't do that anymore.