• We will be performing upgrades on the forums and server over the weekend. The forums may be unavailable multiple times for up to an hour each. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we work to make the forums even better.

Supporting MC cable with Cable Tray

Status
Not open for further replies.

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
The values in column 1 of Table 392.22(A) are just 7/6 * the width, rounded to the nearest 0.5". So I would stay that 42" wide tray would have an allowable fill of 49 sq in^2, and it would be unreasonable not to allow its use.

Cheers, Wayne
 

Tainted

Senior Member
Location
New York
Occupation
Engineer (PE)
The values in column 1 of Table 392.22(A) are just 7/6 * the width, rounded to the nearest 0.5". So I would stay that 42" wide tray would have an allowable fill of 49 sq in^2, and it would be unreasonable not to allow its use.

Cheers, Wayne
but how did you determine this? If it's not in the code, you can't really use that assumption, can you?
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
That's my judgement call, I would say extrapolation in this case is reasonable, and not allowing extrapolation would be unreasonable. AHJs may still be unreasonable.

As to determining that "the values in column 1 of Table 392.22(A) are just 7/6 * the width," it was by inspection. I.e. I calculated the ratios for each row, and noticed that most of them were 7/6. And the ones that weren't were the widths that aren't multiples of 6", and then the table entry just comes from rounding 1/3 and 2/3 both to 0.5.

Cheers, Wayne
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
2/0 awg 4 conductors MC cable overall diameter is 1.75 inches.

Then 55 cables present 130.78 inch^2.

If according Table 392.22(A1) in a 36 inches wide cable tray maximum 42 square inches is recommended you need 3 parallel tray of 3 feet and one of 1/2 feet.

Ladder or Ventilated Trough Cable Trays Containing Any Mixture of Cables.

A 1/2 feet may be reccomended as clearance between trays [in the same plane] that you need a total width of 5 feet.
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
If you will follow ANSI/NEMA WC 51 ICEA P-54-440 Tab.5-7 for a cable tray of 36" and 1.53" overall cable diameter you'll get 50 A for 55 cable in 2 layers [no space free].
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
Sorry. In my above post [#24] the total required width has to be 10.5 instead
of 5 fts.
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
If the grounding wire it is only #6 instead of 2/0 [4 of the same cross section area] then the overall diameter could be 1.53".Then 55 cables total area 55*1.53^2/4*pi()=101.12 square inch and the total width will be only 8.5 fts.
You may put this in two plane keeping one foot [vertical clearance].
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
In Canada, the CEC rule 12-2200 details the requirements.

With cables less then 50mm in diameter in a tray, the minimum vertical clearance is 150mm between trays.

With cables greater then 50mm in diameter in a tray, the minimum vertical clearence is 300mm between trays.

Side clearence, to a wall or another tray, is 600mm where the width of the cable tray installation exceeds 1 m.
 

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
As I checked the maximum squareinch permissible according to NEC Art 392.22 A3 for solid bottom cable tray meet ANSI/NEMA WC 51 ICEA P-54-440 Tab.5-7 for 1.167 inch calculated depth.
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
You mean something like this? I don’t see how a single
layer could ever be interpreted as “bundling”, especially with the larger sizes
2b50db31a9692bece335f9339b6e5640.jpg
I am not real familiar with the requirements for supporting MC cable but what is the point of putting that wire grid in if you have perpendicular strut already. Why not just support it off the unistrut and not mess with the wire grid.
 
I am not real familiar with the requirements for supporting MC cable but what is the point of putting that wire grid in if you have perpendicular strut already. Why not just support it off the unistrut and not mess with the wire grid.
I wired an old mill building once with exposed #1&#2 MC feeder cables attached to strut. In hindsight, I actually kinda like the idea of adding the wire mesh. It gets to be a lot of strut when you need them every 6 feet, and it takes a lot of fiddling around to get them all neat and parallel. Plus, depending on the location and occupancy, it provides some protection from people doing stupid things like hanging stuff on the MC. The one I did was marketed to artists and freaks so there were lots of parties there. We did box them in where they ran up walls, but they remained exposed on the ceiling.
 

Jolted

Member
Location
Wisconsin
I wired an old mill building once with exposed #1&#2 MC feeder cables attached to strut. In hindsight, I actually kinda like the idea of adding the wire mesh. It gets to be a lot of strut when you need them every 6 feet, and it takes a lot of fiddling around to get them all neat and parallel. Plus, depending on the location and occupancy, it provides some protection from people doing stupid things like hanging stuff on the MC. The one I did was marketed to artists and freaks so there were lots of parties there. We did box them in where they ran up walls, but they remained exposed on the ceiling.

Yes, exactly. This building didn’t have any additional structural elements to anchor to either. In hindsight, MC was not a great fit in that building, it was just to tight. If I was doing it over, I’d bend EMT and pull wire.
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
So is the "wire mesh" a ladder type cable tray? (The portion on the right clearly has short sides, so it is a U-shaped cross section). Or is that a much beefier product, and this wire mesh something else?

Cheers, Wayne
 
So is the "wire mesh" a ladder type cable tray? (The portion on the right clearly has short sides, so it is a U-shaped cross section). Or is that a much beefier product, and this wire mesh something else?

Cheers, Wayne
Good question. At first I just thought it was just some commodity wire mesh product, but upon closer inspection I see it has upturned edges.
 

Jolted

Member
Location
Wisconsin
So is the "wire mesh" a ladder type cable tray? (The portion on the right clearly has short sides, so it is a U-shaped cross section). Or is that a much beefier product, and this wire mesh something else?

Cheers, Wayne

We refer to it as basket tray most of the time, primarily gets used for low voltage wiring. Ladder tray is a different product
 

KDough

Member
Location
San Jose, CA
Occupation
Electrician 42 yrs / Electrical Inspector 4yrs
We also call it basket tray. And it is common to see it used as shown. Some contractors get a bit carried away with the number of M/C cables that they put on it. The pictures posted look to be ok, but I usually ask for the MII and that should give you a load limit per square foot or linear foot and a maximum distance between supports.. You would then take the weight of one foot of cable and figure how many pounds of cable per foot of tray to see if it is within the weight limit of of the tray.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top