Surge protection installation on disconnect, Line side or Load side?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're absolutely not wrong, but I do wonder how much of an issue two wires under one lug really is. I know I've done it when there absolutely wasn't another option, and not had any issues. Just place the smaller conductor behind the larger, and do a tug test to check.

It's one of those things that's gospel and part of the code, but might deserve another look.


SceneryDriver
I too have done it many times with no issues but for some reason Inspectors love to pick on that rule if it is done in a way that isn't a problem... but I guess they have probably seen it done in so many wrong ways that they don't want anyone making a habit of it?
 
I too have done it many times with no issues but for some reason Inspectors love to pick on that rule if it is done in a way that isn't a problem... but I guess they have probably seen it done in so many wrong ways that they don't want anyone making a habit of it?
I've had to add sub-metering equipment to existing services a few times, and the only way to "tap" the breaker or lugs was to place the wee little conductor behind the much larger one; think 14awg to power the metering equipment on a 200A service. I like to crimp a long-nose ferrule onto the small conductor and then place it behind the larger one before tightening the lug . I figure that way, the 14awg wire isn't really different than the individual strands of the large conductor. I also typically zip tie the conductors together right below the lug, so that some muppet pulling on the little conductor has less chance of inflicting damage at the termination.


SceneryDriver
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top