TL- DR - It is a shame that it doesn't get the same treatment as sections like solar.
I understand where you are coming from. Art. 450 is in "Equipment for General Use" which does not normally include more intricate installation details and remains vague so that it does not infringe on many earlier sections. But I think it does more of a disservice to the installer, designer and code enforcer.
The equipment for general use section remains indifferent to how that equipment is treated in earlier sections of the code. Where "Special Equipment" is very thorough on how those devices modify earlier sections. As an example, the exception for 250.97 as it applies to solar is not in Art.250 but rather in art. 690. That is because it applies to solar. Transformers being a "Equipment for General Use", means it does not get the same treatment.
I think this leads to more misunderstandings of the code and the way it applies to it. If instead of having the exceptions for outdoor transformers in the separately derived section of Art. 250.30, along with other specific transformer related codes (Art. 240.21(C), it would make understanding the codes easier. When the code is easier to understand, it is easier for designers, installers, and code enforcers. That ultimately makes the installation safer.
I am relatively new to this forum, but have noticed that transformers typically create confusion and disagreement even among the more seasoned professionals. The confusion is not to be solely blamed on the way the code is written, obviously, but it could be easier to interpret.
P.S. I am using NEC 2020.