Jpflex
Electrician big leagues
- Location
- Victorville
- Occupation
- Electrician commercial and residential
The table isn't for Other Than Continuous MOTORS. It's for Other Than Continuous DUTY.This table does make sense in that it applies to determining percent of motor NAMEPLATE FULL LOAD CURRENT FOR OTHER THAN CONTINUOUS MOTORS but yet in contradiction it list a column for percentage of FLC for CONTINUOUS rated motors?
Does your knowing that place you in a category above big league ?The table isn't for Other Than Continuous MOTORS. It's for Other Than Continuous DUTY.
Does asking this mean that you are all knowing? I believe the journeyman’s test is mostly open book because of the 1000s of codes and areas that some do not work in.Does your knowing that place you in a category above big league ?![]()
So continuous motor as on for more than 3 hours at full loaded current vs continuous duty or duty cycle on/ off cycles 100.% on time still is ambiguous on NECs partThe table isn't for Other Than Continuous MOTORS. It's for Other Than Continuous DUTY.
He is an Umpire!Does asking this mean that you are all knowing? I believe the journeyman’s test is mostly open book because of the 1000s of codes and areas that some do not work in.
Big league = big transformers, high voltage and some line work. What category are you?
Yes and some of us here did not have the privilege of jobs paying for our schooling nor have the money for formal education.He is an Umpire!![]()
And I have a license with the federal communications commission central electronics tech association with 20 years in Direct Current working on automotive gas and diesel computers and solid state electronics would you consider yourself big league here.There are some big, big, league players here and I acknowledge that I would not make it as a pimple on their ass despite 6 decades in the industry
A varying duty type motor but continuous rated motorBring it down, no need in further comments along these lines. Back on subject please!
I don't see any ambiguity on the NEC's part on that section.still is ambiguous on NECs part
Yes, the question is poorly worded, but that's not the NEC's problem.This description is ambiguous for the question below
