Do you have a weekly goal for number of threads you get locked?Mimicry without realizing its repeating bad information.
A perfect specimen of most American voters.
Do you have a weekly goal for number of threads you get locked?Mimicry without realizing its repeating bad information.
A perfect specimen of most American voters.
I can list all the panels I have put non CL tandems in!Many modern panels are listed for all tandem breakers. I have an Eaton 40/80 which allows tandems in every slot.
I can't! It's way too many.I can list all the panels I have put non CL tandems in!![]()
Your reply makes more sense if applied to corner grounded delta or even ungrounded 240 delta systems. not really any good reason to use single pole breakers on those though I suppose it could be tempting to try to use tandems on those if you are short on spaces and want to supply two pole loads through adjacent breakers. But the tandems will not have a straight 240 rating.The issue is slash-rated vs straight rated breakers.
A slash rating, such as 120/240V, means it's rated for 240V between any pair of conductors in the system, and not more than 120V to ground on the particular circuit where it's used. What you need for using on an ungrounded system, are straight-rated breakers, that are rated for the full 240V, regardless of where ground is within that range. An ungrounded system may generally be in a metastable state of being 120V to ground, but there's no guarantee that it remains that way. It could have a single line-to-ground fault, that goes undetected.
The majority of 1-pole breakers in general, are slash-rated. This is likely the case for tandem breakers as well.
Non CTL?I can list all the panels I have put non CL tandems in!![]()
With Eaton panels using all non-CTL breakers is pretty much standard.Non CTL?
Homeline doesn't have a non CTL breaker AFAIK and is mostly because they didn't develop that product until after the CTL requirements were in place.
I just stumbled across an Eaton paper that basically says CTL vs non CTL is obsolete now and use whatever you want.With Eaton panels using all non-CTL breakers is pretty much standard.
I just stumbled across an Eaton paper that basically says CTL vs non CTL is obsolete now and use whatever you want.
Since there is no longer a 42 circuit limit this entire CTL and non-CTL nonsense should be completely removed from the NEC.I just stumbled across an Eaton paper that basically says CTL vs non CTL is obsolete now and use whatever you want.
If all branch circuits in any relatively full panel are loaded like that, you risk tripping the main. Really nothing to do with tandems, just makes it easier.One caution with using tandem even with a panel listed to have all tandem (40/80 panel) is the total load of all the branch circuits combined with all tandems can overload the main breaker and cause unwanted tripping.
Had a customer argue over the main tripping while the individual breakers didn't and couldn't understand how is that possible. 100A panel and 10 near capacity 20A breakers running between 16 and 18A each.
Was there a lot of other loads besides those 10 circuits? If those 10 circuits are 120 volts and you can put 5 on each leg then the main shouldn't trip.Had a customer argue over the main tripping while the individual breakers didn't and couldn't understand how is that possible. 100A panel and 10 near capacity 20A breakers running between 16 and 18A each.
Isn't the CTL issue the part of the UL Listing? Panelboard bussing ampacity is a function of the panel construction. If the panel was designed and listed with only 30 circuits, putting in wiring for 60 might overheat the panel and the neutral bus may not have enough room.Since there is no longer a 42 circuit limit this entire CTL and non-CTL nonsense should be completely removed from the NEC.
These new panels come as say 30/60 or 40/80 with the larger number being all twin breakers. Even with non-CTL breakers you are still required to follow the listing. As long as the listing number of breakers is followed CLT or non-CTL doesn't matter.Isn't the CTL issue the part of the UL Listing? Panelboard bussing ampacity is a function of the panel construction. If the panel was designed and listed with only 30 circuits, putting in wiring for 60 might overheat the panel and the neutral bus may not have enough room.
And this is the problem behind many NEC requirements.As long as the listing number of breakers is followed....
That's the function of the main breaker. Overloading is not dependent on the quantity of loads.If the panel was designed and listed with only 30 circuits, putting in wiring for 60 might overheat the panel and the neutral bus may not have enough room.
Fair point but as Larry stated you still have a main CB to protect the conductors and the panel unless it's a split bus.And this is the problem behind many NEC requirements.
For overloads, but not internal heat transfer/dissipation if there are twice as many conductors in there.Fair point but as Larry stated you still have a main CB to protect the conductors and the panel unless it's a split bus.![]()
Electrical needs a different type of "AI", called "Actual Intelligence"...Electrical related AI answers are still terrible.