teflon tape on conduit threads.

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

reyamkram

Senior Member
Location
Hanover park, il
I came in to work and found, this see pictures, I do not believe this is right, and I believe will interfere with the ground fault current path.
I would like to know some opinions on that matter, because I would like to bring it up to the AHJ. it is a hazardous location, Class 1 division 1,
we have flammable vapor gases.

Any help and information, thank you.
reyamkram.
 

Attachments

  • 120.png
    120.png
    693.7 KB · Views: 53
  • 120-1.png
    120-1.png
    698.5 KB · Views: 53
In practice, the contact pressures on tapered threads that are drawn up tight will usually be high enough that you'll end up with metal-to-metal contact, despite starting with a few wraps of PTFE tape.

But you're right; it shouldn't be there. The threads should be assembled dry. A metallic anti-seize compound would be acceptable, but isn't necessary.
 
drcampbell said:
In practice, the contact pressures on tapered threads that are drawn up tight will usually be high enough that you'll end up with metal-to-metal contact, despite starting with a few wraps of PTFE tape.

But you're right; it shouldn't be there. The threads should be assembled dry. A metallic anti-seize compound would be acceptable, but isn't necessary.
Click to expand...
Threads on raceway fittings are part of the pressure relief design for explosion proof applications, using anything on threads that would effectively seal those threads inhibits this ability. When an explosion does occur within raceway and/or associated enclosures the hot gases of that explosion are forced through the threads and spiral around the circumference of the threaded joint, cooling them as it travels this path. By the time it reaches the outside atmosphere (which may may contain easily ignitable gases) it will be cooled enough it won't be an ignition source. Anti-seize compounds will also effectively create a seal that is not desired here.
 
kwired said:
... Anti-seize compounds will also effectively create a seal that is not desired here.
Click to expand...
At least one of the approved corrosion resistant compounds required by 300.6(A) for field cut threads appears to be almost identical to copper never-seize.
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
At least one of the approved corrosion resistant compounds required by 300.6(A) for field cut threads appears to be almost identical to copper never-seize.
Click to expand...
I dunno, kind of goes against what I have been taught where part of reasoning for threaded assembly of components, not just raceways, but same goes for threaded box or conduit body covers as well. Then the bolt on covers that have machined mating surfaces supposedly have similar function. They have somewhat wide flat machined surface, no gasket or sealers are used because when an explosion occurs pressure escapes through what little gap is between surfaces but escaping gases are cooled sufficiently passing through that wide mating surface area so there is no threat when they exit.

That is what I remember learning about this kind of equipment long ago
 
Great memory rbalex, referring back to a 2009 thread.

Teflon tape on conduit threads means a plumber did the install, not a real electrician. It’s probably not your only problem.

Does the NEC HB still address the issue in the commentary? See post #16 at rbalex link.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top