hmspe
Senior Member
- Location
- Temple, TX
- Occupation
- PE
I ran across something I consider a bit unusual and wanted to pass it along and get your thoughts.
An electrical utility just rejected an installation that had 3 meters on a tire warehouse/office. The building owner wanted the space designed so that it could be split for two tenants, but at this point it's single tenant.
The house meter wasn't an issue, but they said that NEC 230.3 allows only one meter per tenant, and my design had two meters for the tenant space, each supplying a 200A, 120/208 panel. The electrical design is done so that the space can be split for two tenants by adding a wall, with no re-work of the electrical required. The back story is that if there were enough small meters it would be possible to avoid demand penalties when total demand reaches specific trip points. This service is too small to ever reach the trip points. I asked if that meant that if a restaurant took 3 bays of a strip mall we'd have to replace the service for the strip and got different answers on different days -- 'no, it doesn't apply to strip malls', and 'yes'. I asked for a written copy of the policy but apparently it's unwritten.
First time in 23 years as a PE and 12 years in private practice that I've run across this interpretation. I obviously disagree with their reading of 230.2, but I'm not sure there's much I can do about it.
Martin
An electrical utility just rejected an installation that had 3 meters on a tire warehouse/office. The building owner wanted the space designed so that it could be split for two tenants, but at this point it's single tenant.
The house meter wasn't an issue, but they said that NEC 230.3 allows only one meter per tenant, and my design had two meters for the tenant space, each supplying a 200A, 120/208 panel. The electrical design is done so that the space can be split for two tenants by adding a wall, with no re-work of the electrical required. The back story is that if there were enough small meters it would be possible to avoid demand penalties when total demand reaches specific trip points. This service is too small to ever reach the trip points. I asked if that meant that if a restaurant took 3 bays of a strip mall we'd have to replace the service for the strip and got different answers on different days -- 'no, it doesn't apply to strip malls', and 'yes'. I asked for a written copy of the policy but apparently it's unwritten.
First time in 23 years as a PE and 12 years in private practice that I've run across this interpretation. I obviously disagree with their reading of 230.2, but I'm not sure there's much I can do about it.
Martin