The 2021 IECC and the IECC in general has good intention, but promotes bad design.

PE (always learning)

Senior Member
Location
Saint Louis
Occupation
Professional Engineer
The IECC has always been a thorn in my side to begin with, but now with the 2021 IECC my rage grows even more. The IECC in my opinion has good intentions, but promotes bad design and in the end I think is mostly fruitless in it's ideals to conserve energy. Several points I wanted to make below:

1) How much energy savings are we really getting with all of the occupancy sensors and daylight sensing controls being added on our projects when compared to the production cost and energy it takes to create them? I understand that for large facilities this makes sense, but it just feels like a lobbyist got into the codes and went crazy with trying to promote sensing controls on every little thing we design.

2) Now with the IECC 2021, we have to provide special metering on any new building over 25,000 square feet. These meters have to be placed so that they can measure each type of load on a project. For instance, we have to parcel out our loads on panels so that HVAC, lighting, process loads, receptacle loads, ect. are separated. What If I want to use a panel for mixed use and I have no other close panel to pull from? I think the IECC is promoting bad design and actually adding unnecessary cost to the project. Why can't the utility give us the same information from their metering?

3) I think that the IECC sometimes even conflicts with life safety issues. There was a dental office I was working on where we had a surgery room and the authority having jurisdiction forced me to put occupancy sensors in the surgery room. This felt like a major life safety issue in the fact that if the occupancy sensor shut off while the doctor was mid surgery it could cause some serious issues. I argued with the authority having jurisdiction, but they still made me put in the occupancy sensors.

I think that the IECC was written by bureaucrats who don't understand design and lobbyist who just want to promote the sales of their controls to everyone, which again, how much money and energy are we really saving when every building has to have special building control systems that take time and energy to create and design.

Vent over.
 

ron

Senior Member
The interesting thing that I find, is the arm wrestling in many jurisdictions as to who enforces the applicable Energy Code, if anyone. I put a COMCHECK Pass paste on the drawing and they never seem to follow-up as to whether we really are compliant.
 
The interesting thing that I find, is the arm wrestling in many jurisdictions as to who enforces the applicable Energy Code, if anyone. I put a COMCHECK Pass paste on the drawing and they never seem to follow-up as to whether we really are compliant.
Similar thing here in WA. I guess they passed the energy code, but never mandated anyone to enforce it. L&I does electrical inspections ( outside of most cities) said they are not enforcing it.
 

PE (always learning)

Senior Member
Location
Saint Louis
Occupation
Professional Engineer
The interesting thing that I find, is the arm wrestling in many jurisdictions as to who enforces the applicable Energy Code, if anyone. I put a COMCHECK Pass paste on the drawing and they never seem to follow-up as to whether we really are compliant.
Yes! Who the hell is going to enforce the IECC 2021 in East Saint Louis, when their website still says 2009 IECC under the building codes...
 

ramsy

Roger Ruhle dba NoFixNoPay
Location
LA basin, CA
Occupation
Service Electrician 2020 NEC
Similar thing here in WA. I guess they passed the energy code, but never mandated anyone to enforce it.
Same thing here. COO is no longer held up by energy-code certifications. Prior experts like Fulthrotl who specialized in certifying buildings in CA, had to go back to grunt work.
 
Top