This panel...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: This panel...

I'm not familiar with this style of neutral bar. This panel must be located on the load side of the service disconnect (if there is one installed anywhere...) but is this neutral bar even isolated from the can??
 
Re: This panel...

Originally posted by websparky:
I guess MA is not concerned with plastic above the suspended ceilings? I had no idea!
Neither is the NEC if above the ceiling is not Other Space Used for Environmental Air. :)

The only thing different in MA is the prohibition against NM above commercial suspended ceilings.

Up until 2002 the NEC allowed NM above commercial suspended ceilings. I heard the NEC rule that now prohibits it went in as a trade off with the Steel tube people for allowing NM above 3 floors.

In other words the rule was not changed for safety reasons, MA said the heck with that we will keep doing what has worked fine for years.

The NEC still allows us to install RNC above commercial suspended ceilings so it is not a fuel load issue.

Now if you say that above the ceiling in your picture is "Other Space Used for Environmental Air" that is a different story and I could not run NM in it that space here in MA or NEC states. :)
 
Re: This panel...

Scott,
The three violations are:
1. Single phase SE cable colored black, black and grey with a bare grounded conductor and a separate grounding conductor.
2. Doubled white wires under one screw.
3. A white wire under a breaker screw.

Bob,
You are correct about the older codes and NM.
However, in this case, 300.22(C)(1) does apply to the NM above the ceiling because the space is also used for return air to the HVAC system, so you are correct again.
 
Re: This panel...

Of course, there are problems with the feeder cable, but otherwise the panel is made up pretty nicely.

As far as romex used in a commercial buildings and above suspended ceilings, it's a non-issue. It's not unsafe. I don't buy the smoke load argument. I would be far more concerned with the building furnishings burning than the wire and cable above a ceiling. :roll:
 
Re: This panel...

Originally posted by websparky:
in this case, 300.22(C)(1) does apply to the NM above the ceiling because the space is also used for return air to the HVAC system
Cool, that was not evident from the photo. :)
 
Re: This panel...

"Jim, this looks like a pretty neat installation to me. Let's see some pics of your work. Wouldn't it be a waste of time and therfore money to do anything neater than this? That's what I have heard. "

Maybe i was bit rough on him.Will bump it up
to 2 1/2.Anyone who can call this neat needs to stay out of panels
 
Re: This panel...

Originally posted by jimwalker:
"Jim, this looks like a pretty neat installation to me. Let's see some pics of your work. Wouldn't it be a waste of time and therfore money to do anything neater than this? That's what I have heard. "

Maybe i was bit rough on him.Will bump it up
to 2 1/2.Anyone who can call this neat needs to stay out of panels
So let's see the pictures Jim.
 
Re: This panel...

I'll show you guys. I'll take the camera to work.

Then tonight, when I post the pictures, I'm going to stick my head out the door to hear the collective gasp across the nation. :D
 
Re: This panel...

Don't the wires need derated since there is more than 9 conductors in a piece of PVC 74" long??

Steve
 
Re: This panel...

Just want to keep this one right at the top for you Jim. Easy to find to post your pictures. :D
 
Re: This panel...

OK did i miss something "Don't the wires need derated since there is more than 9 conductors in a piece of PVC 74" long??" Where did the 74 inches show up in that picture ? I see less than 1 foot.

[ November 08, 2005, 09:27 PM: Message edited by: jimwalker ]
 
Re: This panel...

Jim, we anxiously await your pictures in this thread too. ;)

Roger
 
Re: This panel...

My company issued cell phone has no cam or i would gladly show my signed panel at the only house i did in over a year.Yes it looked great. :) :) :) And that house passed rough and final first time,thanks to Allens thumbs up on what he would be looking for.Also hot check only came up with one problem,an 8 foot flo bulb that was defective.
 
Re: This panel...

Well thank you Jim,It`s just that working in this area for along time i know what the AHJ wants and looks for.Glad it went well.I haven`t stuck my hands in a panel in over 2 years since promotion.But I`ll look for the 800 a ct I did in a home and the panels.Neat as a pin,nothing like what was shown in this thread.Maybe I am anal but I would have had it ripped out and redone the right way.But that`s just the way I am anal :D
 
Re: This panel...

Originally posted by jimwalker:
OK did i miss something "Don't the wires need derated since there is more than 9 conductors in a piece of PVC 74" long??" Where did the 74 inches show up in that picture ? I see less than 1 foot.
Posted by websparky:

The pvc is 74" and extends above the drywall ceiling that is in the equipment room only.
Steve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top