from the way I interpret 334.12 (2) then no.fireryan said:Is is permissible to run romex above a suspended ceiling if the tiles are fire rated?
fireryan said:Is is permissible to run romex above a suspended ceiling if the tiles are fire rated?
fireryan said:Is is permissible to run romex above a suspended ceiling if the tiles are fire rated?
Wouldn't 334.12 (2) deny you using romex above a dropped ceiling in a non-dwelling unit no matter what state you are in, since an AHJ can only go stricter than the code but can't go more lax than the code?iwire said:Sure if it is a dwelling unit or you happen to live in MA.
But no if it is a non-dwelling unit outside of MA.
iwire said:Sure if it is a dwelling unit or you happen to live in MA.
In MA it's permissible to use nm cable exposed in a dropped ceiling for other than residential?
steelersman said:Wouldn't 334.12 (2) deny you using romex above a dropped ceiling in a non-dwelling unit no matter what state you are in, since an AHJ can only go stricter than the code but can't go more lax than the code?
iwire said:It would if MA did not amend that section.
In MA we have about 60 to 70 changes to the NEC, in RI and CT they also have amendments to the NEC.
It is called the "National" electric code but that is really wishful thinking, many areas make changes to the NEC when they adopt it. Chicago and and I think NYC both have their own electric codes.
I was always told that the NEC is a minimum standard and that some AHJ's can adopt stricter standards but not looser standards. So is it possible for an AHJ to make an amendment let's say to the rule of 4 and a half feet for supporting or securing romex and make the new rule for themselves to be every 6 feet support for romex?iwire said:It would if MA did not amend that section.
In MA we have about 60 to 70 changes to the NEC, in RI and CT they also have amendments to the NEC.
It is called the "National" electric code but that is really wishful thinking, many areas make changes to the NEC when they adopt it. Chicago and and I think NYC both have their own electric codes.
steelersman said:I was always told that the NEC is a minimum standard and that some AHJ's can adopt stricter standards but not looser standards. So is it possible for an AHJ to make an amendment let's say to the rule of 4 and a half feet for supporting or securing romex and make the new rule for themselves to be every 6 feet support for romex?
I know about not all states adopting the new code and that it takes a few years before a lot of them do but I thought that the NEC (whichever year they are on) was a minimum and that they are not to go looser than that. I recently learned that some states don't have any code such as PA, so therefore I guess all bets are off in states such as those correct?Dennis Alwon said:Some states are still on the 2002 NEC while others use the IRC. Many states amend. NC amended the change made for nm in crawl spaces. I believe NJ does not require Arc Faults. and so on.
steelersman said:I recently learned that some states don't have any code such as PA, so therefore
they use the IEC : http://www.mikeholt.com/statelicense.php#PAiwire said:As far as I know PA uses the NEC but many areas of PA do not require licensing.
steelersman said:I was always told that the NEC is a minimum standard and that some AHJ's can adopt stricter standards but not looser standards. So is it possible for an AHJ to make an amendment let's say to the rule of 4 and a half feet for supporting or securing romex and make the new rule for themselves to be every 6 feet support for romex?
Dennis Alwon said:Some states are still on the 2002 NEC while others use the IRC. Many states amend. NC amended the change made for nm in crawl spaces. I believe NJ does not require Arc Faults. and so on.
steelersman said:they use the IEC : http://www.mikeholt.com/statelicense.php#PA
2003 IEC adopted December 31, 2003 - References the 2002 NEC