One interesting thing in the formula you used (post7)is application of .9 efficiency factor. Does it mean output KVA is generally used instead of input KVA?That was my mistake, assuming a 3-phase transformer.
.
One interesting thing in the formula you used (post7)is application of .9 efficiency factor. Does it mean output KVA is generally used instead of input KVA?That was my mistake, assuming a 3-phase transformer.
.
Good point, xfmr efficiency ratings are OEM specified on Nameplate, and modern hi-efficiency transformers are far below traditional eff. tables based on KVA, so inrush currents are higher, blowing traditional overload selections. NEC Annex D - Example D10 does not explain where 0.9eff came from, but using xfmr Nameplate values has become more critical.One interesting thing in the formula you used (post7)is application of .9 efficiency factor. Does it mean output KVA is generally used instead of input KVA?
It's a single phase transformer.Wouldn't that be 120 amps?
100,000/480/1.73=120
I work as a maintenance electrician in metal foundry, started in April, and I have a question concerning an existing transformer that I believe the OCPD is not properly sized.
It is a 100kva single phase transformer with primary voltage of 480vac and secondary voltage of 240vac. The secondary is feeding a panel, less than 10ft away. The panel has 200amp main with 17 of the 20amp breakers being used out of the 40 available slots.
The transformer primary is being protected by a 100amp breaker in a 400amp protected power distribution cabinet. My calculations for primary only protection show that this transformer should be protected by a 300amp OCPD.
Am I missing something to where the 100amp breaker is adequate protection?