- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC
- Occupation
- Retired Electrical Contractor
To de-rate NM we start from the 90C ampacity. Where do we start from when we de-rate UF.................................
One what assume 90° based on the wording of 340.112 although that does say 90° when"used as a substitute of NM"
The text on the left says that only applies to single conductor UF cable. Typical multiconductor UF is governed by Article 340. So ignore that table.Here is my confusion-- from the 2020 but also the same in the 2017
340.10 Informational Note points us to 310.15(A)(3) for temperature limitationsNEC 340.80 is missing the language to allow type UF-B to use the 90C base ampacity for derating.
Following that train of references doesn't seem to lead to anything that would overcome the plain language of 340.80, and the fact that 340.80 is missing the allowances found in 334.80.340.10 Informational Note points us to 310.15(A)(3) for temperature limitations
Informational Note: See 310.15(A)(3) for temperature limitation of conductors.
Yes, another circular NEC reference from 340 -> 310.15(A)(3) -> Table 310.104 -> back full circle to 340 with no answer.Following that train of references doesn't seem to lead to anything that would overcome the plain language of 340.80, and the fact that 340.80 is missing the allowances found in 334.80.
Cheers, Wayne
Underground feeder
and branch-circuit
cable — single
conductor (for
Type UF cable
employing more
than one
conductor, see
Article 340).
If NM & UF-B are both 60C max ampacity, with 90C conductors, then de-rating can start from 90C column of T310.16, as long as adjusted load remains below 60C column.Yes but 340.112 states that UF is rated 90C when used as nm. How strange is it that using the wire outside or in the earth changes the ampacity to 60C. Normally ratings in wire go from 90C for dry and 75C for wet
If NM & UF-B are both 60C max ampacity, with 90C conductors, then de-rating can start from 90C column of T310.16, as long as adjusted load remains below 60C column.
Can anyone show us an NM or UF cable listing for 75C, much less 90C?Not everyone sees it that way. That is how I assumed it was but it is rare to de-rate UF
No, it says that if you want to use UF as NM, then you need to use UF-B (the kind with 90C conductors), not "UF". Just like all NM you use has to be NM-B. It doesn't say anything about ampacity.Yes but 340.112 states that UF is rated 90C when used as nm.
That's backwards. The text is (to paraphase) "UF, single conductor (not multi-conductor, for that see Article 340)" The whole table is about single conductor wires, there are no entries for multi-conductor cables.I read it as single conductor UF is to use art. 340.
Yes, on NM, because that is what 334.80 tells us. No on UF, because 340.80 says the ampacity is based on 60C conductors, full stop. [Unless, of course, UF-B cable is dual rated as NM-B cable already, not sure if that might be true. But then you'd still only be able to derate from the 90C ampacity where the cable could have been NM-B.]If NM & UF-B are both 60C max ampacity, with 90C conductors, then de-rating can start from 90C column of T310.16, as long as adjusted load remains below 60C column.
That is only when being uses as a subtitute for NM cable. For UF applications it's 60° C for everything, including derating.If NM & UF-B are both 60C max ampacity, with 90C conductors, then de-rating can start from 90C column of T310.16, as long as adjusted load remains below 60C column.
While that would be logical, I don't see how the allowance in 334.80 ever applies to UF cable. So you'd be stuck with 60C for everything even when using UF as a substitute for NM.That is only when being uses as a substitute for NM cable.
Seems to me 340.80 clarifies ampacity of cable assembly, not derating adjustments of dry conductors in accordance with 310.15For UF applications it's 60° C for everything, including derating.