Upcoming wire pull and conduit calcs

But what about 250.142(B) exception 2?
Exception No. 2:
It shall be permissible to connect meter enclosures to the grounded circuit conductor on the load side of the service disconnect if all of the following conditions apply:

  • (1)Ground-fault protection of equipment is not installed.
  • (2)All meter enclosures are located immediately adjacent to the service disconnecting means.
  • (3)The size of the grounded circuit conductor is not smaller than the size specified in Table 250.122 for equipment grounding conductors.
If you are missing just one of these it doesn't apply. Meter at the pole without the disconnect at the pole would fail #2. the Enhanced content for this section give rationale for the prohibition.

250.142 (B)Enhanced content:
If the grounded circuit conductor is re-grounded on the load side of the service and the grounded conductor becomes disconnected at any point on the line side of the service, the equipment grounding conductor (EGC) and all conductive parts connected to it would become energized. Under this condition, the potential to ground of any exposed metal parts could be raised to line voltage. This rise in potential on noncurrent-carrying conductive parts could result in arcing in concealed spaces and could pose a severe shock hazard, particularly if contact is made with metal piping or ductwork.

Even without an open grounded conductor, a connection between the grounded conductor and the EGC on the load side of the service places the EGC in a parallel circuit path with the grounded conductor. Exposed and concealed non-current-carrying metal parts could also be hazardous.

See also 250.30(A)(3) and 250.32(B), which prohibit the creation of parallel paths for normal neutral current.
 
Exception No. 2:
It shall be permissible to connect meter enclosures to the grounded circuit conductor on the load side of the service disconnect if all of the following conditions apply:

  • (1)Ground-fault protection of equipment is not installed.
  • (2)All meter enclosures are located immediately adjacent to the service disconnecting means.
  • (3)The size of the grounded circuit conductor is not smaller than the size specified in Table 250.122 for equipment grounding conductors.
If you are missing just one of these it doesn't apply. Meter at the pole without the disconnect at the pole would fail #2. the Enhanced content for this section give rationale for the prohibition.

250.142 (B)Enhanced content:
If the grounded circuit conductor is re-grounded on the load side of the service and the grounded conductor becomes disconnected at any point on the line side of the service, the equipment grounding conductor (EGC) and all conductive parts connected to it would become energized. Under this condition, the potential to ground of any exposed metal parts could be raised to line voltage. This rise in potential on noncurrent-carrying conductive parts could result in arcing in concealed spaces and could pose a severe shock hazard, particularly if contact is made with metal piping or ductwork.

Even without an open grounded conductor, a connection between the grounded conductor and the EGC on the load side of the service places the EGC in a parallel circuit path with the grounded conductor. Exposed and concealed non-current-carrying metal parts could also be hazardous.

See also 250.30(A)(3) and 250.32(B), which prohibit the creation of parallel paths for normal neutral current.
Not creating a parallel path
Load side feed to house panel
PVC conduit
Only ground fault protection is in house panel
My drawing
 
Last edited:
250.142 (B)Enhanced content:
If the grounded circuit conductor is re-grounded on the load side of the service and the grounded conductor becomes disconnected at any point on the line side of the service, the equipment grounding conductor (EGC) and all conductive parts connected to it would become energized. Under this condition, the potential to ground of any exposed metal parts could be raised to line voltage.
this would be the case ANY time the grounded conductor becomes disconnected on the line side of the service?
 
250.142(B) exception 2 is only giving you permission to bond a meter socket to the grounded conductor, it's not giving you permission to do that to anything past it.
Tomorrow when you have more time can you expand and break that down barny style for me?

I'm seeing a grey area and thats why i brought it up in the first place
 
But your underground will be on load side with a meter/main at the pole, so you can't use 250.142(A) Supply Side Equipment for 3 wire. So you have to use:
250.142(B) Load-Side Equipment.
Except as permitted in 250.30(A)(1), 250.32(B)(1), Exception No. 1, and Part X of Article 250, a grounded (Neutral) circuit conductor shall not be connected to non–current-carrying metal parts of equipment on the load side of the service disconnecting means or on the load side of a separately derived system disconnecting means or the overcurrent devices for a separately derived system not having a main disconnecting means. NFPA 2020

So with 120/240 single phase you would have 2 hot a neutral and a separate grounding conductor from the meter/disconnect to the panel in the dwelling. Also a Grounding Electrode System at the pole structure and at the dwelling.
250.142(B) ----> 250.32(B) exception 2 ----> 250.30(a)1 exception 1
 
Exception No. 2:
It shall be permissible to connect meter enclosures to the grounded circuit conductor on the load side of the service disconnect if all of the following conditions apply:

  • (1)Ground-fault protection of equipment is not installed.
  • (2)All meter enclosures are located immediately adjacent to the service disconnecting means.
  • (3)The size of the grounded circuit conductor is not smaller than the size specified in Table 250.122 for equipment grounding conductors.
If you are missing just one of these it doesn't apply. Meter at the pole without the disconnect at the pole would fail #2.

^this^

Your meter is not directly next to the service disconnecting means. You don’t get ex. 2.
 
But the meter enclosure IS the service disconnecting means

It has a 200A main - then a second handle of course in the house panel 245' away
In your drawing it looks like the service drop lands at your meter directly, then your service conductors run underground to the panel, making it your service disconnect.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6939.jpeg
    IMG_6939.jpeg
    195.9 KB · Views: 2
In your drawing it looks like the service drop lands at your meter directly, then your service conductors run underground to the panel, making it your service disconnect.
Right. The meter main is adjacent to the disconnect because it IS the disconnect -

There's no parallel path

I can't figure out what I'm missing or not understanding
 
a 200amp breaker in the meter/main panel ON THE POLE isn't considered the disconnecting means for the downstream panel?
I don't have jurisdiction to install a disconnecting means above the before the meter.
I see my mistake. That’s solves the issue I saw.
 
Typo !!

250.30(a)1 exception 2 at the end

You are not a separately derived system.

250.32(B)(1) is your rule.

Exception 1 doesn't work.

Exception 2 is for separately derived systems.

Service conductors end at the first disconnecting OCPD. Everything down stream of the first 200A is considered an outside feeder. Sections 225 and 250.32 would apply.

See definitions in Art. 100 for Feeder, Service Equipment, and Service Conductors for more detail.
 
You are not a separately derived system.

250.32(B)(1) is your rule.

Exception 1 doesn't work.

Exception 2 is for separately derived systems.

Service conductors end at the first disconnecting OCPD. Everything down stream of the first 200A is considered an outside feeder. Sections 225 and 250.32 would apply.

See definitions in Art. 100 for Feeder, Service Equipment, and Service Conductors

You are not a separately derived system.

250.32(B)(1) is your rule.

Exception 1 doesn't work.

Exception 2 is for separately derived systems.

Service conductors end at the first disconnecting OCPD. Everything down stream of the first 200A is considered an outside feeder. Sections 225 and 250.32 would apply.

See definitions in Art. 100 for Feeder, Service Equipment, and Service Conductors for more detail.
Separately derived system is what got me. I guess that settles it!
 
250.32(B)(1) Exception No. 1:
For installations made in compliance with previous editions of this Code that permitted such connection, the grounded conductor run with the supply to the building or structure shall be permitted to serve as the ground-fault return path if all of the following requirements continue to be met:

  • (1) An equipment grounding conductor is not run with the supply to the building or structure.
  • (2) There are no continuous metallic paths bonded to the grounding system in each building or structure involved.
  • (3) Ground-fault protection of equipment has not been installed on the supply side of the feeder(s).
This allowance is when you have an existing installation and it was compliant at the time of original installation. You suggest this is a new installation. As such the Exception is not applicable.

With the Meter/Main at pole every subsequent Panel is a sub-panel subject to separate grounded and grounding conductors being run after the meter/main.
 
250.32(B)(1) Exception No. 1:
For installations made in compliance with previous editions of this Code that permitted such connection, the grounded conductor run with the supply to the building or structure shall be permitted to serve as the ground-fault return path if all of the following requirements continue to be met:

  • (1) An equipment grounding conductor is not run with the supply to the building or structure.
  • (2) There are no continuous metallic paths bonded to the grounding system in each building or structure involved.
  • (3) Ground-fault protection of equipment has not been installed on the supply side of the feeder(s).
This allowance is when you have an existing installation and it was compliant at the time of original installation. You suggest this is a new installation. As such the Exception is not applicable.

With the Meter/Main at pole every subsequent Panel is a sub-panel subject to separate grounded and grounding conductors being run after the meter/main.
Right i had already excluded exception 1 from consideration and typo'd in my post when i meant to write exception #2

I wasnt clear in my head about the separately derived system in exception 2..
 
Top