Robolord
New member
- Location
- Salem, Utah, USA
Can NM wire be used , in a commercial building, above a grid ceiling? The grid ceiling is not being used as a return air plenum.
If the building is a classified as one that will allow NM you can run nm thru the walls but not above a dropped ceiling
If the drop ceiling has no access and a 15 min rating in a III, IV or V then its ok
If the ceiling does not have access, the NM is not exposed and would be permitted.Not sure I agree with that. I don't see anything that mentions access and 334.12(A)(20 says prohibited exposed in dropped or suspended ceilings in other than one and two family dwelling.
I can see a dropped ceiling without access being a violation
Exposed (as applied to wiring methods). On or attached to the surface or behind panels designed to allow access.
If the ceiling does not have access, the NM is not exposed and would be permitted.
Thisis how I see it. No go in a dropped or suspended ceiling in other than dwelling.Exposed to what? It is exposed in the ceiling it does not say it must be exposed to us or be viewable. My thinking is that a dropped area will allow fire to travel and the nm cable is toxic so it would not be allowed.
Did you read the definition that I posted? The definition in Article 100 is very clear that the wiring method is not exposed unless it is behind panels that are designed to be removed. A lay in ceiling panel is an example of a panel that is designed to be removed.Exposed to what? It is exposed in the ceiling it does not say it must be exposed to us or be viewable. My thinking is that a dropped area will allow fire to travel and the nm cable is toxic so it would not be allowed.
That cuts if for me. I am never going to put a couch above a suspended ceiling.The phosgenes from the average couch is X100 toxic than RX....
~RJ~
I can see a dropped ceiling without access being a violation
We would and have run NM above what we call 'Chicago Grid' which looks just like a suspended ceiling system except that instead of lay in tiles full size sheets of drywall get screwed to it.
No access, no chance of damage and no violation.![]()
It doesn't need to make sense...it is the NECThe whole thing makes no sense. So what if the nm is exposed in a dropped ceiling. Really how different is that then being installed in a dropped ceiling where there is no access. I don't get it... The only thing I can think of is that there is less chance of damage if there is no access.
It doesn't need to make sense...it is the NEC
Like I said in an earlier post, there is no technical reason for this rule...it was just part of the "politics" when the 3 story rule was removed from the code. Without this restriction, it is unlikely there would have been enough votes in the CMP to remove the 3 story rule.
It doesn't need to make sense...it is the NEC
Like I said in an earlier post, there is no technical reason for this rule...it was just part of the "politics" when the 3 story rule was removed from the code. Without this restriction, it is unlikely there would have been enough votes in the CMP to remove the 3 story rule.