per SqD... and more
per SqD... and more
From a Square D white paper?
110.14(C) Temperature Limitations. The temperature rating associated with the ampacity of a conductor shall be selected and coordinated so as not to exceed the lowest temperature rating of any connected termination, conductor, or device. Conductors with temperature ratings higher than specified for terminations shall be permitted to be used for ampacity adjustment, correction, or both.
You can use the 90?C conductor value for derating and correction, typically through conduit or a raceway. If the resulting derated value is more than that of the 75? rating of that conductor (haven?t seen it happen for what I do) you must use the 75? conductor rating for terminations. If the calculation result is less, you must use the lower value.
Example: A dimming rack with a 300A service
Calculate using a 75?C conductor:
500kcmil copper THWN has a 75?C ampacity of 380A (NEC 310.16)
A dimming rack has a current carrying neutral so we have 4 current carrying conductors in a conduit, derated to 80%, 380A x 80% = 304A.
Calculate using a 90?C conductor
400kcmil copper THHN has a 90?C ampacity of 380A
We have 4 current carrying conductors in a conduit derated to 80%, 380A x 80% = 304A.
400kcmil THHN has a 75?C ampacity of 335A, but the derated value of the 90?C wire is 304A, so the lower value is used. Had the result been higher than the 75?C rating, the 75?C rating would be used for the terminations.
This is a bit confusing as an example because the 380A amp value shows up for both conductors in 310.16, but it is correct.
Also, there are a lot of Al9Cu terminals out there that lead you to believe the connection is rated for 90?C. This is generally NOT true; check the manufacturers UL listed rating for the device for the correct value.
Lastly, I?m not sure a junction box to transition from 90?C to 75?C solves the problem because as I understand it connections are limited to the lowest rating in the chain? I would love to know this wasn?t true
kb