Frank DuVal
Senior Member
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor, Electrical Engineer
If you visit the antiqueradio.com forum you will see the issue are:
1. manufacturers spec transformers in wattage handling pretty close to maximum, so when the line voltage increases the heat of the transformer can then exceed what the winding insulation can handle.
2. B+ can get excessive, if line voltage goes up 10 volts, say nameplate is 115 VAC and the receptacle supplies 125 VAC, that is ~8% increase. If the B+ was designed for 300 VDC, now the transformer and rectifier will produce 324 volts. Not too bad, but if 350 VDC designed, it is now 378 VDC, close to ratings of 400 volt electrolytics. Really close if the bean counters made them install 375 VDC electrolytics!
FIlament voltage was never thought to be a problem. 6.3 design is now 6.8.
Now, if the nameplate is 110 VAC, woops, now that's over a 12% increase and the B+ is very over spec. The 6.3 filament is just 7 volts.
1. manufacturers spec transformers in wattage handling pretty close to maximum, so when the line voltage increases the heat of the transformer can then exceed what the winding insulation can handle.
2. B+ can get excessive, if line voltage goes up 10 volts, say nameplate is 115 VAC and the receptacle supplies 125 VAC, that is ~8% increase. If the B+ was designed for 300 VDC, now the transformer and rectifier will produce 324 volts. Not too bad, but if 350 VDC designed, it is now 378 VDC, close to ratings of 400 volt electrolytics. Really close if the bean counters made them install 375 VDC electrolytics!
FIlament voltage was never thought to be a problem. 6.3 design is now 6.8.
Now, if the nameplate is 110 VAC, woops, now that's over a 12% increase and the B+ is very over spec. The 6.3 filament is just 7 volts.