weressl
Esteemed Member
Drive could be reset by front panel buttons, or remote input.
cf
Sorry, but that should NEVER be a normal operating mode.
Drive could be reset by front panel buttons, or remote input.
cf
I've always considered that 240.9 (2005) limited thermal overloads to use in motor circuits. However, I have had at least one knowledgable person agree with you.--- MCP is listed as part of a NEMA sized combination starter and while it is designed to protect motors they could be configured to provide protection for other devices.---.
I've always considered that 240.9 (2005) limited thermal overloads to use in motor circuits. However, I have had at least one knowledgable person agree with you.
cf
Yes, but under normal stopping conditions (as opposed to loss of supply) you'd remove the drive enable before dropping the input contactor so the VFD doesn't think it should be running. That's what we do when we use an input contactor - plus the aux. supply of course.That is true, but the default setting for many drives is to trip on undervoltage, like when the VFD thinks it should be running but the input voltage disappears.
Originally Posted by Cold Fusion Drive could be reset by front panel buttons, or remote input.
cf
That confuses me a bit. I have always considered a front panel button marked, "RESET" is designed to be used for a local fault reset.Sorry, but that should NEVER be a normal operating mode.
No, they weren't another dummy - just wrong.:grin:Phew.... I was worried that it was just another dummy......![]()
A listed combination starter is not a listed branch circuit protective device.I don't think that would be an issue as long as the combination starter is left intact and properly sized.
As an example.That confuses me a bit. I have always considered a front panel button marked, "RESET" is designed to be used for a local fault reset.
cf
While I agree with the rest, I'm not so sure the last part of that statement (the part I highlighted) is valid. IIRC, the acceptability of an MCP is only as part of a listed motor controller. What I question is, is an existing upstream motor starter still considered as such if the VFD is placed in between it and the motor? Other sections of the NEC dealing specifically with VFD installations would indicate that they are to be treated as separate systems. That makes me believe that the OCPD of a VFD must be a full UL489 listed MCCB or fuses.... MCP is listed as part of a NEMA sized combination starter and while it is designed to protect motors they could be configured to provide protection for other devices.
...
As an example.
In unmanned water treatment works, control is from a central location. A front panel reset could be fifty miles away. Unacceptable if that's just for a reset with no fault other than loss of supply.
Bes -Originally Posted by Cold Fusion
Drive could be reset by front panel buttons, or remote input.
cf
I was responding to what you quoted in post #25 and I included all of what you said there in my response.Bes -
Really should read the whole quote ...:smile:
I was responding to what you quoted in post #25 and I included all of what you said there in my response.
"That confuses me a bit. I have always considered a front panel button marked, "RESET" is designed to be used for a local fault reset.
cf"
Nothing about remote reset in that..........so which part didn't I read?
:wink:
That confuses me a bit. I have always considered a front panel button marked, "RESET" is designed to be used for a local fault reset.
cf
While I agree with the rest, I'm not so sure the last part of that statement (the part I highlighted) is valid. IIRC, the acceptability of an MCP is only as part of a listed motor controller. What I question is, is an existing upstream motor starter still considered as such if the VFD is placed in between it and the motor? Other sections of the NEC dealing specifically with VFD installations would indicate that they are to be treated as separate systems. That makes me believe that the OCPD of a VFD must be a full UL489 listed MCCB or fuses.
Wer -He said that pressing the RESET button should be no problem after stopping the motor. ---
Wer -...I am saying that a RESET button should never be part of a normal on/off operation.
This is especialy true when it is a remote reset, when the operatior has no idea what he is re-setting. ...
Wer -
My confusion quotient is rising. Who "he"? And when did he say, "...pressing the RESET button should be no problem after stopping the motor."
Wer -
Not only is it "especially true", it's un-equivocally true, un-categorically true, most-assuredly .....
Possibly even an axiom of the Laws of God and Physics.
Anybody with actual operating experience knows that.
cf
Indeed.Hummmm (sounds of deep thought) Ahhhhh .(throat clearing sounds while coming up with something that is not demeaning and only mildly teasing) ...... How about the part in posts 15, 21, 25, and 30 that say, "or remote input" But I'll bet you already knew that.
cf