This sort of ground fault protection IMHO might even make sense from an energy savings and cost savings perspective, not just a safety perspective.
I don't know how common this is, but I keep reading (here and in other forums) about faults in heating elements that allow current to flow to EGC or to piping. The fault current is limited by a portion of the heating element, and thus never gets high enough to trip a breaker. Further the fault current bypasses the thermostat, and thus the current flow _continuously_. The net result lots of power consumption, a very high electric bill, and little benefit to the customer (the water is somewhat warmer).
If such fault are common enough, then the cost of ground fault protection for these breakers would be less than the average cost in wasted electricity of these faults.
-Jon