- Location
- Wisconsin
- Occupation
- PE (Retired) - Power Systems
Jim already provided his comment.
I don't remember stating a preference.
Jim already provided his comment.
It meant that I liked my SR-50 better than the HP's that were offered wayback in 1974. But for the life of me, I cannot remember the specific advantage it had.120305-2007 EST
Jim:
What did you mean by "I prefered my TI SR-50" in post #8?
.
It meant that I liked my SR-50 better than the HP's that were offered wayback in 1974. But for the life of me, I cannot remember the specific advantage it had.
I get the ridicule and insults anyway. What is especially galling is that I was part of the team that developed the hp-35.
Thank you. I bought one when they came out & still have it. Alas, it no longer functions.
It is too bad that H and P don't still run the company. My earliest knowledge of the company was when Sy Sterling was just starting as a sales rep for HP about 46 or 47 when he demonstrated the HP oscillator. It was probably a 200 something. By the early 50s it was a 200CD. I bought one of those about 61, and still have it. In the early 50s I used several 200CDs in psychophysical audio experiments.
.
I still have my trusty 41CV that got me through engineering school in the 80's. We don' need no steenking equals sign!
Salesmen. The engineer probably told him something different:Hey, that freed up a key for something else didn't it?
Years ago, the local hp salesman was demonstrating their sampling scope which used cathode followers in their probe. He purposely dropped one on the floor to demonstrate how rugged they were. Didn't work after that!
Then one of engineers built one of the sampling scopes into an air tight enclosure for a trade show. That scope didn't last long either.