I was on a job and we were in the process of walking through the building on final inspection. I had done allot of jobs where this same inspector came to check out my work, so he knew how I did things.
As we went down one hall he tried to turn on the lights using one three way. At the other end he tried the other three way. The second switch did not turn off the lights. He didn't say a word and continued his inspection.
When he was done he signed the building permit. I asked if I had to fix the three way before he could sign me off. He said no. He told me that it was his job to insure that the work was safe, and my job to insure that it works.
What do the rest of you think about this inspectors interpretation about the scope of his authority?
As we went down one hall he tried to turn on the lights using one three way. At the other end he tried the other three way. The second switch did not turn off the lights. He didn't say a word and continued his inspection.
When he was done he signed the building permit. I asked if I had to fix the three way before he could sign me off. He said no. He told me that it was his job to insure that the work was safe, and my job to insure that it works.
What do the rest of you think about this inspectors interpretation about the scope of his authority?