mayanees
Senior Member
- Location
- Westminster, MD
- Occupation
- Electrical Engineer and Master Electrician
To my colleagues at Mike Holt's forum, I pose the question:
What is our course of action to dispute an Inspector's ruling on an NEC topic?
I'm currently involved in a fast-track proejct where the MDIA inspector, using the County-approved 1999 NEC, has interpeted working space and dedicated electrical space incorrectly..... as I see it.
His contention is that the dedicated electrical space of 6' over the width and depth of the equipment extends out into the "working space", such that you can't mount sprinklers below 6' above the working space. I have a 1999 NEC Code Handbook interpretation that specifically lists that as acceptable.
Having being in this electrical field for 25 years plus, I've never had cause to dispute the ruling of the AHJ, so I don't know where to start. And the problem with this job is that it's moving too fast to expect resolution within the timeframe required, so we'll have to do something else to comply.
But hopefully someone can enlighten me, so I'll be preparewd next time.
Thanks,
JM
What is our course of action to dispute an Inspector's ruling on an NEC topic?
I'm currently involved in a fast-track proejct where the MDIA inspector, using the County-approved 1999 NEC, has interpeted working space and dedicated electrical space incorrectly..... as I see it.
His contention is that the dedicated electrical space of 6' over the width and depth of the equipment extends out into the "working space", such that you can't mount sprinklers below 6' above the working space. I have a 1999 NEC Code Handbook interpretation that specifically lists that as acceptable.
Having being in this electrical field for 25 years plus, I've never had cause to dispute the ruling of the AHJ, so I don't know where to start. And the problem with this job is that it's moving too fast to expect resolution within the timeframe required, so we'll have to do something else to comply.
But hopefully someone can enlighten me, so I'll be preparewd next time.
Thanks,
JM
