dwcaveney said:If eveyone in the world knows that there is a stop sign at Fourth and Elm. Does the cop have to prove to the jury, there is a stop sign there, or just the issue of fact, that you ran it?
EDIT: Sorry I might be beating a dead horse.
A law enforcement officer must, at least, provide the accused with the section of law they have alledgedly violated. So far, Officer DW, you've provided nothing.
Oh, and I forgot about NEMA. I'm sure they're going to want to hear about this new thing called a two-way.