Why must boxes be installed flush with the surface?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bob (Iwire),

I was certainly referring to the photo posted by Mike03a3. Sorry for any confusion. Thanks for the help George.

Mark
 
Dave58er said:
Was that for 5/8" drywall?

Yes, I use 5/8" rings for 1/2" drywall and 3/4" rings for 5/8" drywall.

The factory measurement is overall, not just the raised part, by the time you add the 'flat' part and the screw heads they come out perfect.
 
iwire said:
Yes, I use 5/8" rings for 1/2" drywall and 3/4" rings for 5/8" drywall.

The factory measurement is overall, not just the raised part, by the time you add the 'flat' part and the screw heads they come out perfect.
I like that Bob, it was the answer I was hoping to get back. I wish more people would do that. Why is it that every time a guy has 5/8" drywall he orders 5/8" plaster rings, then wonders why they are so far back?

IMHO this should happen like twice before you start thinking, hey, maybe I should try something different.
 
The sparkguard is used on the recessed box in a combustible surface to protect the combustible from being ignited by a spark. . It's used with masonry to protect the wire insulation from being cut by the sharp and/or abrasive edges of the masonry.

Altho drywall surfaces aren't exempt by 314.20, for drywall I don't see any reason to worry about them as a contractor or look for them as an inspector.

David
 
Dave58er said:
I like that Bob, it was the answer I was hoping to get back. I wish more people would do that. Why is it that every time a guy has 5/8" drywall he orders 5/8" plaster rings, then wonders why they are so far back?
Agreed. I even mentioned this in the Colorado Jim thread.
 
georgestolz said:
I thought that's what the insulation on the conductors did?

?

The insulation is what makes the smoke.

I am really not following you George, do you deny that 'stuff' happens?

If the insulation methods where perfect we could pretty much eliminate OCP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top