It's always good to assume there was a valid reason...for even the craziest stuff.
However, in this case, there may be no valid reason.
There are two requirements for AC disconnects:
1. an AC disconnect within line of sight from the inverter
2. If the solar is connected to the main supply side (AKA line side without a breaker), then an AC disconnect must be put near the main..... that must be minimum 60 amps and fusible.
So in the case of supply side connections it is a (60Afusible) switch switching a (30A) switch..... Which seems stupid electrically speaking.... but the point is to have an accessible switch near the inverter so no one is tempted to work on an inverter live ....but rather it's easy for them to reach and shut off power.
Of course these requirements can be met with a single disconnect if placed near the inverter and main at once.
I think the installer was new to solar and tried to follow the rules without understanding the intent.
THEN...... I think two mistakes were made.
First, the designers specified a fusible 60 amp but it's just one letter off for a Square D disconnect between that and a non-fusible disconnect, and I believe that's what was delivered.
The crew doesn't know and just installed what they got.
Second, mistake reading the single line diagram the two switches are right next to each other and either their locations weren't called out or the installation crew didn't realize that one switch should be near the inverter on the other one near the main
So they put them right next to each other kind of like the plans show.
Long story short there's no point here that I could see.
I have never seen anything like that or installed anything like it in 20 years.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk