Wind Farm Load usage calculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
View attachment 2566857

Arthur C. Clarke raised the possibility of such a structure in Fountains of Paradise. An important consideration is that it would only be possible if it were built directly on the equator. Another is that the asteroid must be in orbit 22,236 miles above mean sea level.
 

Joethemechanic

Senior Member
Location
Hazleton Pa
Occupation
Electro-Mechanical Technician. Industrial machinery
Arthur C. Clarke raised the possibility of such a structure in Fountains of Paradise. An important consideration is that it would only be possible if it were built directly on the equator. Another is that the asteroid must be in orbit 22,236 miles above mean sea level.
Yeah and the mainstream media reports on this pie in the sky kind of stuff like it's reality. STEM education has been lacking for at least 40 years, and most people fall for this kind of stuff. Worse yet you have public policy and money supporting a bunch of hair brained ideas that are never going to work.

I'm not saying that some of these things do not have niche applications. But how many wind turbines and solar panels would it take to power large scale aluminum smelting or EAF steelmaking? And those are probably the best of the green technology
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Yeah and the mainstream media reports on this pie in the sky kind of stuff like it's reality. STEM education has been lacking for at least 40 years, and most people fall for this kind of stuff. Worse yet you have public policy and money supporting a bunch of hair brained ideas that are never going to work.

I'm not saying that some of these things do not have niche applications. But how many wind turbines and solar panels would it take to power large scale aluminum smelting or EAF steelmaking? And those are probably the best of the green technology
Nothing changes overnight. In the near to medium term the world's energy needs are going to be supplied by a mosaic of sources - solar, wind, hydro, nuclear fission, hydrogen, and burning fossil fuels. In the long term, fossil fuels will be of necessity phased out because supply will be depleted, so reliance will have to be shifted to other sources and/or demand will need to be reduced, "and" being more likely than "or".
 

gadfly56

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
Arthur C. Clarke raised the possibility of such a structure in Fountains of Paradise. An important consideration is that it would only be possible if it were built directly on the equator. Another is that the asteroid must be in orbit 22,236 miles above mean sea level.
Aptly named a "Clarke orbit" in his honor.
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
Yeah and the mainstream media reports on this pie in the sky kind of stuff like it's reality. STEM education has been lacking for at least 40 years, and most people fall for this kind of stuff. Worse yet you have public policy and money supporting a bunch of hair brained ideas that are never going to work.

I'm not saying that some of these things do not have niche applications. But how many wind turbines and solar panels would it take to power large scale aluminum smelting or EAF steelmaking? And those are probably the best of the green technology

You forgot something….

b8dd92df1d944326cc29ae57284df303.jpg
 

AC\DC

Senior Member
Location
Florence,Oregon,Lane
Occupation
EC
It’s a religion. Nothing is ever enough. And their goal post keep kicking down the road. Only way it’s going to change is when we’re in the same situation as Germany and are quack pot ideas, make are energy prices 4 x higher and are pollution higher then before the crazy idea. Hence current Germany.
Nuts.
 
It’s a religion. Nothing is ever enough. And their goal post keep kicking down the road. Only way it’s going to change is when we’re in the same situation as Germany and are quack pot ideas, make are energy prices 4 x higher and are pollution higher then before the crazy idea. Hence current Germany.
Nuts.
You forgot something:
 

Attachments

  • b8dd92df1d944326cc29ae57284df303.jpg
    b8dd92df1d944326cc29ae57284df303.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 3

ramsy

Roger Ruhle dba NoFixNoPay
Location
LA basin, CA
Occupation
Service Electrician 2020 NEC
Hence current Germany. Nuts.
Everyone except France seems to have leveraged the Fukushima nuclear disaster to shift their energy policy against nuclear-fission reactors, cancel the regulatory-intensive burden of new nuclear developments, and non-renew existing maintenance-intensive reactors. Concerns with nuclear-weapons proliferation from spent fuel theft, and disposal costs may also escalate budget over-runs.

Adversity to regulatory burdens seems to have favored any other option over nuclear reactors.

Fukushima inspired global cost cutting that axed a clean source of energy generation, replacing it with coal or rolling-power outages. Savings in reactor spending was shifted to more tax-credit incentives for solar arrays, renewable-energy programs, and contracts with R&D labs, such as the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems.

The German economy learned the hard way how their state-subsidized R&D partnerships between Fraunhofer and Chinese-production partners result in patent infringement that converts into Chinese global-market dominance.

Fraunhofer patent holders could only try to buy enforcement efforts from local Chinese governors, the same way Bill Gates did before leaving Microsoft. It was a losing battle of whack-a-mole trying to stop counterfeit distributions of Windows software, by buying off local Chinese sheriffs to raid the counterfeit factories.

Today reports of fish around Fukushima have 180 times the legal limit of radioactive cesium, and un-regulated Salmon farms saturate the meat with antibiotics & pesticides. The result is more doctors discouraging their patients from eating fish, since no amount of cooking reduces toxicity, or antibiotic-resistant disease in the meat.
 
Last edited:

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
...I'm not saying that some of these things do not have niche applications. But how many wind turbines and solar panels would it take to power large scale aluminum smelting or EAF steelmaking? And those are probably the best of the green technology
Much less than California or Germany or China already has operating.

Of course, those industrial processes you mention are really the niche applications that require something special. Most solar and wind production goes to general residential and commercial use on the grid.
 

Joethemechanic

Senior Member
Location
Hazleton Pa
Occupation
Electro-Mechanical Technician. Industrial machinery
When I'm talking about niche, I'm talking about this kind of stuff

3028096-inline-driving8bit2048pxsrgbwebfile (1).jpg



And then the crazy stuff like wanting to put freight transportation on battery electric trucks riding on pneumatic rubber tires running on asphalt roads. If the goal is to reduce energy consumption rail is the best way to move freight. Moving stuff on rubber tires is just so inefficient.
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
And then the crazy stuff like wanting to put freight transportation on battery electric trucks riding on pneumatic rubber tires running on asphalt roads. If the goal is to reduce energy consumption rail is the best way to move freight. Moving stuff on rubber tires is just so inefficient.

True, until you get to the last few miles where the tracks don’t go. Local-ish deliveries on light to medium sized electric trucks (not semis) starts to make sense.
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
And then the crazy stuff like wanting to put freight transportation on battery electric trucks riding on pneumatic rubber tires running on asphalt roads. If the goal is to reduce energy consumption rail is the best way to move freight. Moving stuff on rubber tires is just so inefficient.
Agree with you here. And I don't think people realize how much fuel and carbon emissions are saved by railroads. (Also labor costs.) Railroads should be electrifying though.
 

Joethemechanic

Senior Member
Location
Hazleton Pa
Occupation
Electro-Mechanical Technician. Industrial machinery
Agree with you here. And I don't think people realize how much fuel and carbon emissions are saved by railroads. (Also labor costs.) Railroads should be electrifying though.

I don't always agree with these guys , but they make some good points sometimes. It seems that there was light electric rail freight in some cities into the 1970's

b1a10eb13267c09da3ac53ade682e8e1--pennsylvania-railroad-electric-locomotive.jpg

And apparently GG1s were used for freight back in the day
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
True, until you get to the last few miles where the tracks don’t go. Local-ish deliveries on light to medium sized electric trucks (not semis) starts to make sense.
You need trailers or containers for efficient intermodal. You don't want the weight of the cab and drivetrain on the trains, nor that economic asset unavailable while in transit. And right now the intermodal freight system relies on trucks for the last hundred miles or so on average, I think. So no, transloading to 2 axle trucks is not going to be the way. More intermodal terminal buildout to shorten that last leg could help. But there's going to be a place for semis.
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
You need trailers or containers for efficient intermodal. You don't want the weight of the cab and drivetrain on the trains, nor that economic asset unavailable while in transit. And right now the intermodal freight system relies on trucks for the last hundred miles or so on average, I think. So no, transloading to 2 axle trucks is not going to be the way. More intermodal terminal buildout to shorten that last leg could help. But there's going to be a place for semis.

Right…I was mostly thinking of the last mile which is only a portion of a container load.

Semis are needed, but with current technology, electric semis don’t make much sense.
 

Joethemechanic

Senior Member
Location
Hazleton Pa
Occupation
Electro-Mechanical Technician. Industrial machinery
Right…I was mostly thinking of the last mile which is only a portion of a container load.

Semis are needed, but with current technology, electric semis don’t make much sense.
Electric truck tractors should work fine for a distribution area of lets say a 25 mile air radius around the rail freight hubs. Batteries could be cut down to a sensible size/weight.

Intermodal freight containers are a very mature technology. They were developed by Malcolm McLean in 1956

SeaLand.jpg
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
Electric truck tractors should work fine for a distribution area of lets say a 25 mile air radius around the rail freight hubs. Batteries could be cut down to a sensible size/weight.

Intermodal freight containers are a very mature technology. They were developed by Malcolm McLean in 1956

View attachment 2566885

Right, I should have said “over-the-road, long-haul electric semis don’t make much sense.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top