I agree, it isn’t but I want to know if there are loopholes cause we want as little space as possible for our run… it’s hardI thougth that in that other thread it was pretty much agreed upon that using a wireway for that purpose wasn't feasible.
I agree, it isn’t but I want to know if there are loopholes cause we want as little space as possible for our run… it’s hardI thougth that in that other thread it was pretty much agreed upon that using a wireway for that purpose wasn't feasible.
No loopholes. Just my 2 cents the vertical wireway idea is a poor one. We go through this all of the time especially in apartment building construction because the architect doesn't want give an extra square foot of space for the electrical risers that the owner can rent. We usually tell the designer that this is what we need to make it code compliant and they will have to make it work even if that means creating a shaft or other pathway that didn't exist in the original design.I agree, it isn’t but I want to know if there are loopholes cause we want as little space as possible for our run… it’s hard
Lol! I get it. It’s hard working such little space… out of curiosity, how was the feeders ran from meter bank to the apartments? Did you have meter banks?No loopholes. Just my 2 cents the vertical wireway idea is a poor one. We go through this all of the time especially in apartment building construction because the architect doesn't want give an extra square foot of space for the electrical risers that the owner can rent. We usually tell the designer that this is what we need to make it code compliant and they will have to make it work even if that means creating a shaft or other pathway that didn't exist in the original design.
Our last big apartment project was two towers one 26 floors and the other 40 floors and over 700 apartments and condos. We literally took the design drawings and threw them away and then came up with our own plan which was going to save the owners money (value engineering). They liked our idea so much that they told the design engineer we're going to do it their way not yours so get on board.
Yes, we ended up using 4160 volt risers throughout the building (saved lots of space) and then step-down substations to get 208Y/120. After the substations we had many "meter banks". All of the metering was electronic sub-metering not physical meters. The space saved by using less risers was eaten up by the substations.Lol! I get it. It’s hard working such little space… out of curiosity, how was the feeders ran from meter bank to the apartments? Did you have meter banks?
Besides the logistics and code compliance of the wireway approach, I am just not seeing how it would save space over running MC cables....I agree, it isn’t but I want to know if there are loopholes cause we want as little space as possible for our run… it’s hard
You can put 30 CCC in a 4x4 wire trough without derating, that’s whyBesides the logistics and code compliance of the wireway approach, I am just not seeing how it would save space over running MC cables....
I guess this assumes that since there is no point for fire entry there is no need to firestop inside the busway?
So say you can put 10 100 Amp feeders in a 4x4 wireway per fill and without derating. That is 16 square inches. A 2-2-2-6 AL MC cable is 1 inch diameter. A 1-1-1-4 is 1 1/8. Even with a .5 inch space between the cables......is that extra square inch for the 10th cable really a deal breaker? Besides seems like cables have more flexibility and can be installed in dead spaces like walls.You can put 30 CCC in a 4x4 wire trough without derating, that’s why
Different scenario… hard to explainSo say you can put 10 100 Amp feeders in a 4x4 wireway per fill and without derating. That is 16 square inches. A 2-2-2-6 AL MC cable is 1 inch diameter. A 1-1-1-4 is 1 1/8. Even with a .5 inch space between the cables......is that extra square inch for the 10th cable really a deal breaker? Besides seems like cables have more flexibility and can be installed in dead spaces like walls.