Yes, and? I don't see anyone arguing any different. We know they are diodes.It's and LED which it is a light emitting diode
Yes, and? I don't see anyone arguing any different. We know they are diodes.It's and LED which it is a light emitting diode
Then lets stick with the DC.Yes, and? I don't see anyone arguing any different. We know they are diodes.
Why?Then lets stick with the DC.
Cos it is simpler.Why?
How so?Cos it is simpler.
Yes correct. Are you saying it will only work when installed the correct way and it's a trial and error affair?It's and LED which it is a light emitting diode
Now that you mention it, I remember car interior-light LEDs having instructions saying to flip the bayonet insert if it doesn't work the first try, which suggests that polarity reversal doesn't hurt it, further suggesting that AC won't hurt it either, finally suggesting that it will work on AC.Yes correct. Are you saying it will only work when installed the correct way and it's a trial and error affair?
Beosoeker is fast asleep, in the GMT time zoneYes correct. Are you saying it will only work when installed the correct way and it's a trial and error affair?
Dammit! I've been hitting refresh every 10 seconds waiting for his response....Beosoeker is fast asleep, in the GMT time zone
Not really. You'd need twice the number of diodes for the ACSounds like you’ve made your decision. Still a bit of a curiosity though. If it is intended for automotive use, I would expect it to have capacitors for filtering in addition to the bridge rectifier, and would work nicely on AC.
They make bridge rectifiers in tiny DF type SMD packages..Not really. You'd need twice the number of diodes for the AC
But the simplest DC which where started on the first post. Why do you want complicate it?They make bridge rectifiers in tiny DF type SMD packages..
I'm not complicating it. We are talking about what is possible given what is available. If you have an AC power source and a lamp rated for either, then what is the problem? Your desire for simplicity doesn't always match practicality.But the simplest DC which where started on the first post. Why do you want complicate it?
This is the opening post:I'm not complicating it. We are talking about what is possible given what is available. If you have an AC power source and a lamp rated for either, then what is the problem? Your desire for simplicity doesn't always match practicality.
I don't see how you can say it's that simple. It is obvious they do not actually need DC. Since the base is not polarized they clearly have electronics built in so do not need DC. So that is what we are talking about why do they say DC when they don't need DC? Sorry it's not that simple.This is the opening post:
"Why does it say "12v DC"?"
Because it is THAT simple.. Even I can grasp that.
I don't see how you can say it's that simple. It is obvious they do not actually need DC. Since the base is not polarized they clearly have electronics built in so do not need DC. So that is what we are talking about why do they say DC when they don't need DC? Sorry it's not that simple.
The original post says that it is LED. That IS DC.I don't see how you can say it's that simple. It is obvious they do not actually need DC. Since the base is not polarized they clearly have electronics built in so do not need DC. So that is what we are talking about why do they say DC when they don't need DC? Sorry it's not that simple.
So no LEDs work on AC? Funny you say that because my house is full of LED lamps and my incoming power is AC. It's just that simple.The original post says that it is LED. That IS DC.