- Location
- Wisconsin
- Occupation
- PE (Retired) - Power Systems
Re: XFMR secondary OCPD
I don't know why it uses the phrase "required".
My guess is - if the primary protection happens to be greater than 125% then of course secondary protection of 125% is required.
Again my guess, the code assumes that a primary protective device rating of 125% max. will always protect the secondary windings of 600V or less transformers regardless of the configuration. The secondary conductors themselves are protected by 240.4(F) and not by anything in 450.3(B)
My interpretation is: Adding a secondary protective device is an option that allows you to use the second row of table 450.3(B), which allows the primary to be sized larger. My point is, there is nothing in the NEC 450 that says you must exceed a 125% primary OCPD.
Maybe my argument is nothing more than what comes first, the chicken or the egg? So my reasoning is; start with the panel 408.36, then protect the conductors 240.4(F), and finally choose the applicable row of table 450.3(B).
forgot the word "not"
[ December 06, 2005, 06:21 PM: Message edited by: jim dungar ]
I don't know why it uses the phrase "required".
My guess is - if the primary protection happens to be greater than 125% then of course secondary protection of 125% is required.
Again my guess, the code assumes that a primary protective device rating of 125% max. will always protect the secondary windings of 600V or less transformers regardless of the configuration. The secondary conductors themselves are protected by 240.4(F) and not by anything in 450.3(B)
My interpretation is: Adding a secondary protective device is an option that allows you to use the second row of table 450.3(B), which allows the primary to be sized larger. My point is, there is nothing in the NEC 450 that says you must exceed a 125% primary OCPD.
Maybe my argument is nothing more than what comes first, the chicken or the egg? So my reasoning is; start with the panel 408.36, then protect the conductors 240.4(F), and finally choose the applicable row of table 450.3(B).
forgot the word "not"
[ December 06, 2005, 06:21 PM: Message edited by: jim dungar ]