electrofelon
Senior Member
- Location
- Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
No, why would I do that?So you're going to convert the entire house to DC?
No, why would I do that?So you're going to convert the entire house to DC?
No, why would I do that?
You do understand Alternating Current, don't you?
All it has to do is prevent reverse energy flow on the incoming mains. That is easy.
You must realize how condescending you're being.
Metering AC power flow at an import/export location and telling a load side power source to throttle to prevent backfeed is a concept I'm sure you can wrap your head around. Moreover, there's already a bunch of widely installed products that do it, such as Powerwall, Enphase Ensemble, Solaredge inverters, etc.
I am having visions of a CT metering total solar production, the other CT for total building load.Explain to me this process of preventing the current provided by the inverter from being sent back out the circuit to the utility's transformer.
Explain to me this process of preventing the current provided by the inverter from being sent back out the circuit to the utility's transformer.
Explain to me this process of preventing the current provided by the inverter from being sent back out the circuit to the utility's transformer.
Very easy. You have CT's on the "mains" and they send a signal to the inverter and/or battery so that the inverter can throttle down and/or the battery can uptake the energy if local loads stop using the power. I'm really not sure why this is so difficult to understand, its done all the time. There are also reverse power relays, very common (although that isnt specifically how this company is doing it).
Its easy to prevent reverse energy flow on the mains, what is harder is preventing an overload on the connected branch circuit from the two sources (mentioned by jaggedben).
Im not endorsing all aspects of this product, just saying prevent energy backflow to the utility is easy, and it is an interesting discussion as to whether that precludes the requirement for an interconnect agreement.
I don't think you're following the idea. The CTs on the service conductors (necessarily coupled with a voltage measurement, I think) can quantitatively determine the net power flow, from the grid or to the grid. So the control system can use a feedback loop to ensure there is never net flow to the grid. [On a time scale longer than the response time of the control system.]
E.g. Say the PV/batteries are off, and the house load is 200W. The control system tells the inverter to make up to maybe 150W (for a 50W margin of safety). The inverter says it can make up to 250W in the current conditions? Tell the batteries to charge at 100W, and increase PV production to 250W. The house load increases so the net flow jumps from 50W to 200W? Tell the batteries to stop charging. The net grid flow drops below 50W? Tell the inverter to throttle production. Etc.
Cheers, Wayne
Was there a typo when you wrote "ZERO in terms of energy production if the utility power is on"? If you meant "off", then I understand your concern.I don't think you're following the idea.
But take that same system referenced here, wire it up to a simple dwelling system, and suddenly you've got huge back-feed problems when the utility goes out?
So in other words, this system does ZERO in terms of energy production if the utility power is on?
So......... what happens when the utility power goes out? Does the system simply shut down completely to prevent back-feeding the service?
When California burns every summer, the grid shuts down, along with everyone's grid tied solar arrays.So in other words, this system does ZERO in terms of energy production..
...
Interactive inverters able to switch to battery during blackouts is something new. Tesla power wall may have started this emerging development, but I don't hear much about that anymore.
With a completely electrician free installation, the only possible way to go to island mode is for the owner to manually open the main breaker. Since there is no interlock, I guess they are counting on backfeed sensor to turn off island mode if the main breaker is reclosed.I assume the inverter has anti-islanding protocols equivalent to UL1741.
When the grid is off it produces no energy (or maybe it disconnects from the grid and charges the battery, I didnt look closely enough at it). When the grid is on, it supplies energy, but no energy is sent to the utility. It does not feed energy into the grid even if all local loads are turned off.
Most grid tied systems do. This one may be able to keep charging that battery, again, i didnt look real close at it.
I bought a cheap one of these inverters off ebay a few years ago and set it up to a bunch of damaged panels I had salvaged right before an after work social . A POCO engineer and a solar guy came over also, It blew their minds, I ended up giving it to them because they could not believe it worked. The POCO had an extensive meeting about these, and concluded they do in fact shutdown when the grid does.