- Location
- Lockport, IL
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
Re: Your most observed code violation?
This is not a common violation, but rather an unusual way to get yourself into a violation. I came across it while reviewing drawings for a recent employer. They had a standard table of feeder sizes that gave the phase, neutral, and EGC sizes, along with the conduit size, for a range of ampacity requirements. Good table! However, if they found a need to use a larger feeder, such as for voltage drop considerations, they would merely pick the feeder from the next row down the list (i.e., next higher ampacity). What they did not realize is that this did not give them an EGC that was increased proportionally to the increase in the size of the phase conductor.
This is such a roundabout way to back into a code violation that I have to wonder how often this particular violation comes along, without anyone noticing it.
This is not a common violation, but rather an unusual way to get yourself into a violation. I came across it while reviewing drawings for a recent employer. They had a standard table of feeder sizes that gave the phase, neutral, and EGC sizes, along with the conduit size, for a range of ampacity requirements. Good table! However, if they found a need to use a larger feeder, such as for voltage drop considerations, they would merely pick the feeder from the next row down the list (i.e., next higher ampacity). What they did not realize is that this did not give them an EGC that was increased proportionally to the increase in the size of the phase conductor.
This is such a roundabout way to back into a code violation that I have to wonder how often this particular violation comes along, without anyone noticing it.
