One of the issues that we have here is that people are used to buying electricity by quantity not availability. Because we are used to it, it seems perfectly reasonable that if I use 1/10 the kWh I should pay 1/10 the amount. However this misses the reality that electricity _service_ includes both the stuff delivered (the kWh) _and_ the delivery system (having those kW available when I want them).
If I have a true guaranteed absolute zero export PV system, I might still impact the grid as a whole in the same way as if the PV system were installed on my neighbor's property. In one case there is no accounting because power is flowing from PV source to load on my property behind the meter, in the other case the power flows through two meters. But the variable load as seen by the grid is the same.
So I can understand why the utility has reason to know about (and possibly charge for) production that is always 'behind my meter'.
If the utility tries to make me _pay_ for kWh that I am making and using on my property, then sounds tremendously unfair.
If the utility charges me the same amount for making capacity available to me that I am not using because I have PV, that sounds much more fair. Or if the utility charges me more per kWh because my consumption is now more variable and in particular my consumption is higher when grid PV is not available, that sounds more fair.
-Jon