zig zag transformer

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
The customer transformer is a grounded wye-grounded wye transformer, so I do not see any need for a grounding transformer.
The only thing I can think of is that someone has specified that the inverter output has to remain solidly grounded even when the disconnect is open.
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
The customer transformer is a grounded wye-grounded wye transformer, so I do not see any need for a grounding transformer.
The only thing I can think of is that someone has specified that the inverter output has to remain solidly grounded even when the disconnect is open.

I can't see how an open disconnect would unground the inverter output.
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
Here's a wild and possibly completely boneheaded guess, since I have no understanding of how/why it would work, but...

Having noticed this (yellow highlight is mine)...

zig zag gfp.PNG

...perhaps it is a way of complying with the exception to 705.32, when using a switchboard that was not designed for backfeed.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
I can't see how an open disconnect would unground the inverter output.
I was thinking (mistakenly) of the disconnect also opening the neutral.
If there is no neutral connection to the inverters (line to line operation) then opening the three line conductors opens all connections between inverter output and ground.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
To me, it looks like the midpoint is the artificial neutral, and the only purpose of it is to provide a balanced connection to the earth.
Yet the source ahead of this appears to already be a grounded wye, which should already fulfill that purpose.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
Yet the source ahead of this appears to already be a grounded wye, which should already fulfill that purpose.
Looking hard at the drawing, I renew my comment that the source grounding is only seen when the disconnect is closed, since there is no neutral connection to the inverters. I do not see why floating the inverter output (when not operating, because of anti-islanding) should be harmful, but it still might be the motivation.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
Looking hard at the drawing, I renew my comment that the source grounding is only seen when the disconnect is closed, since there is no neutral connection to the inverters. I do not see why floating the inverter output (when not operating, because of anti-islanding) should be harmful, but it still might be the motivation.

While it's a little hard to say for sure with the photo cutting things off, it does look to me like the neutral goes to the inverters. It seems like the drafter just omitted the neutrals inside the switchboard for clarity.

Not saying you are wrong about the motivation, we've heard about demands for source grounding (which to my knowledge is unnecessary). I also wonder what you think of my 705.32 comment though.
 

Strathead

Senior Member
Location
Ocala, Florida, USA
Occupation
Electrician/Estimator/Project Manager/Superintendent
Also notice the cutting off. It looks like the breaker is a normally open breaker that closes upon activation of the "S" on the right side of the page. Perhaps seeing the rest of the drawing would give some clue as to the intention. I don find it interesting that this is odd enough that no one here with the vast knowledge represented, has yet said, "Oh that is a ..."
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
It is a grounding xfmr for the 480
the assoc cb looks like it is tripped by a 0 seq on the 13.2 kv prim?
why I do not know
it does gnd the load side of the 3000 fused sw if open
 
Also notice the cutting off. It looks like the breaker is a normally open breaker that closes upon activation of the "S" on the right side of the page. Perhaps seeing the rest of the drawing would give some clue as to the intention. I don find it interesting that this is odd enough that no one here with the vast knowledge represented, has yet said, "Oh that is a ..."

Here is a more complete picture. I am confused by the logic of the kirk key. Here is what the note 11 says:

"Direct trip. If 480V 1200A circuit breaker is open, trip sent to 13.2KV 1200A VCB."

So if the Zig Zag or its supply circuit fails, in such a way that causes the breaker to trip (or someone manually turns it off for that matter), they want the MV supply to also open. The 480 system is already grounded, so why is the zig zag needed, and not only that, why do they see it as so important that the MV supply opens if the zig zag goes offline? Is this just perhaps a silly utility requirement based on grounding myths that system grounding is of paramount importance and that "more" is better?
 

Attachments

  • 20170926_203630_resized_3.jpg
    20170926_203630_resized_3.jpg
    136.2 KB · Views: 3
Looking hard at the drawing, I renew my comment that the source grounding is only seen when the disconnect is closed, since there is no neutral connection to the inverters. I do not see why floating the inverter output (when not operating, because of anti-islanding) should be harmful, but it still might be the motivation.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The inverters are SMA sunny tripower, 30KW and do have a neutral. But I do agree that the motivation is likely to do with some (irrational) fear that the inverters will lose their reference to ground and float. Not only do I see that is very imnprobably, but even if it did I dont see that as that big a deal really.
 

wbdvt

Senior Member
Location
Rutland, VT, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer, PE
1200A at 13.2KV ??? That can't be right.

(Is this when an RFI becomes a WTF?)

Why? A 25MVA, 13.2kV Transformer would be about 1100A full load. The system is being supplied by National Grid and this may be a large manufacturing facility supplied off of a 115kV transmission line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top