emahler said:
well, we've all spent a perfectly good sunday arguing about something that we've lost focus of. It appears that every method has it's advantages and drawbacks. I guess the only question i have is this:
Tallgirl, what on earth are you trying to accomplish?
My understanding was that you were looking for a way to get the wire in the walls, but since alot of times it won't be inspected before sheetrocking, you want the ability to fix it and correct miswires after the walls are up.
Or are you trying to provide an installation that will keep the sheetrockers from damaging it no matter how hard they try?
Or are you trying to make life as complicated as possible for the volunteers working down there?
Every option given in this thread will work, quite well in some cases, for any installation. Some are quicker and easier, but don't offer the protection. Some offer better protection, but are slow and laboreous (sp?)
What is it that you are trying to accomplish?
The two big goals are
1). Make it so electricians and their helpers can put wires in the walls without getting in the way of sheetrock.
2). Come up with something that's relatively foolproof so that if a mistake is made -- like someone runs a piece of 12/2 where they should have run 12/3, or 14/2 where they should have run 12/2 -- it can be fixed.
My thinking is that using conduit makes those two goals possible as my thoughts are that installing conduit in a wall doesn't require a license until conductors are put in. That's the first question to resolve. Whether it's Sch40 PVC, Smurf pipe, EMT or RMC (heh) is irrelevant at this point -- it's a question of whether or not I could walk into your house, without having made prior arrangements with an EC to supervise the job, and start putting some kind of tubing in the walls, and not run afoul of the law.
Bob's suggestion about trying to get people trained to do some amount of work and then have electricians come behind them, inspect and take responsibility for the work is a good one. I've worked that way before and so long as I had access to the electrician who was responsible for the building, it went well. My experience is that without strong leaders this breaks down very quickly. There are two issues -- first, will New Orleans accept this approach as an officially sanctioned solution (that's a huge political hot-potato as developers are pressuring the city to steal the land and give it to them), and secondly, can we find someone who's planning to stay in New Orleans long enough to keep this project alive (and that's a huge issue since no one is paid and people start running out of money after several months paying their own car insurance, cell phone bills, and whatnot) until some of the "team leaders" have the same level of experience and leadership skills.
The suggestion by Smart $, I think it was, to use Smurf pipe is something to investigate if we can just keep people from drilling holes 1/2" from the face of studs (or cutting notches, let's not forget the pathologically horrible case) and then failing to protect with some kind of steel plates. I'm not as concerned about the boredom that might come from bending pipe because there's not a lot else to do but gut houses, stand around a fire barrel, shoot the breeze, and avoid the rats and mosquitos. On the other hand, if I can make some jigs to help people drill holes where they belong, and I can get money to buy some of those fancy 6' Greenlee flexible drill bits, Smurf pipe might not be such a bad idea after all.
Anyway, as I've said before, y'all have given a lot of great advice, feedback, criticisms, etc. and it's greatly appreciated.