Actually the instructor has a very good source of information, and he is correct...somewhat.
Buchannans and most wirenuts on the market today are not listed as suitable for grounding purposes.
You can get as mad as you like, it is a pure fact.
Look in the manufacturers product books.
I found this out back in the early 2000s. Ideal's product book is the best for reference purposes.
In the early 2000s, I called a tech from Ideal (you can do the same now if you choose to), and they agreed that only the greenie wirenuts are listed as suitable for grounding purposes.
I told them I thought their book was very misleading. They told me to take a close look and that the pictures and the wording are very clear in showing and telling which wirenuts are listed for which purpose. When you take a look, you will see that colored wirenuts (other than green) and the barrels are only terminated in the pictures to phase conductors. The listing for them is UL 486 & 486C.
If a wirenut is listed as suitable for grounding, it would be UL 467.
What would almost seem ironic is the push-in type of terminals that most seem not to like are listed for both UL 486 and UL 467.
The grounding accessories such as Term-a-Nut Grounding connector is listed for both as well.
There is a reason for this, and it really boils down to two things. I got this info directly from UL.
1. The wirenuts are not required to be listed, unless the termination is for grounding purposes (250.8)
2. Since they are generally not required to be listed, the manufacturers are not going to spend the big bucks to get them listed for grounding, especially since they show them in their catelogs as used for phase connections.
As far as some inspectors requiring particular type wirenuts, that may be what they are being requested to do, or since they may have the same info I have, they may be enforcing for those reasons.
There is other info as far as the dynamics of the fault circuit and what role the wirenuts play in that scenario, that can be left for another thread. :wink: