Re: Infinite Resistance
the "bubble bursts" at a mathematical discontinuity. The interesting thing that happens there is that it suddenly becomes undefined. Nothing more and nothing less (in this case, at least). But it is a "language failure" of sorts...you are refusing (or unwilling?) to accept elements of the mathematical language, and/or the thinking that accompanies it. As for the part about the fundamental structure of nature...the math describes it perfectly & completely (again, in this case at least).
0→∞ is a single entity. It contains all of the positive elements in the universe. You're free to yank the zero off of it and play with it seperately if you like. But what you do with the zero seperately isn't necessarily related to the
original entity. The numbers it contains, by themselves, have no useful meaning. They only have meaning relative to other numbers. Thinking of zero and infinity or any other value as discrete entities necessarily removes at least
some of their meaning. The way I think of it, zero and infinity are as much a connected duality as electricity and magnetism.
The problem with division by zero is that it's terribbly disruptive. It's not allowed as a matter of convention because it introduces chaos. From a practicle stand point it makes perfect sense to disallow it. As long as you do
we can go about our math business immune to it's destrucive effects. The choise to not divide by zero is not one made by math, it's made the users of math. Math doesn't care that it has an integral anomaly, you do. Using convention is important if you want order. But it doesn't redifine the phenomenon. You're so used to the way you use it that you've replaced it with what you use.
There are two things the divide by zero math tricks have in common. Dividing by zero is one. The other is dividing zero. If there's something that can't be done it's divide zero. But that's allowed because it's not destructive to the equation, unless zero is the divisor.
Phweew